84 Baby
Referee
- Messages
- 29,627
Agreed except overs/unders is indeterminate until their respective contracts are completed and also measured against likelihood of repeating performances, e.g. can Simonsson perform as “well” as this year again, will Dunster underperform as much as this year again?Dunster obviously, since he has torn every ligament in his knee since he signed his current deal and would no longer be worth what he is being paid.
Simonsson just had a breakout year and signed in 2021 when his form was not as good. So he is likely providing good value.
Harper signed at the last minute after a season where no other NRL club wanted him. That would make him cheap.
So the only one likely to be on overs is Dunster. Simonsson is likely on unders. Harper is our number five outside back, so you want someone worth more than minimum salary. Bonus if they're only on minimum salary, but we just don't know what Harper would be on. I suspect around $200k, which is minimum salary + f**k all in the context of the salary cap. Russell would be on about the same. Sivo and Penisini would be on decent money, both $400k+
Also saying Dunster is on overs so therefore we need Harper to fill the same basic role is throwing good money after bad.
Realistically Harper is just replacing Waqa for a lot cheaper probably.
But still we already have Simonsson, Dunster and to lesser extent Russell filling the same level, it would’ve been more encouraging signing someone of higher level (yes salary cap blah blah)