Tiger5150
Bench
- Messages
- 3,803
All semantics, you guys need a Simpkins.......and a Nofoaluma
Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
All semantics, you guys need a Simpkins.......and a Nofoaluma
*best
*Baldest
Observations aren't evidence at all. Evidence is things like statistics and video. Opinions supported by these objective facts are absolutely worth more than opinions unsupported by anything other than subjective observation. You don't need to feel inadequate if you can't be bothered backing up your opinions. Sometimes I can't either. There's no need to constantly attack others who do. It just makes you look petty.
As for your criticism of 'selective' evidence, you are again showing your ignorance. There is no evidence that isn't selective. Evidence is by its nature selective:
"Evidence is factual information used to support a claim or belief. It is information and research selected from the best available sources to support a decision."
What is evidence?
Evidence is used to inform decision making to achieve the most effective outcomes.evidenceportal.dcj.nsw.gov.au
We need you to come up with some more quality threads, otherwise this place would descend into chaos.
We are trying to determine who has the smallest penis ffs
You both have Innie's FFS!!
No, I am not. But I am saying that you don't offer up your opinion on players (and "evidence" for your opinion, if you somehow feel you must) and left it at that - without constantly trying to address your inadequacies by "proving" your opinion on players etc is somehow better than anyone else's here.
I think that phrase has been used here for several years, and has previously used in the reverse - whenever you over-react to a gif or picture in reply to one of your nonsense trolling posts, perhaps?
It's the off-season, Pou comes here for an occasional S&M fix when there aren't any game day threads for his "contributions" to cop a similar thrashing.
Simpkins might have been ok but by next season Hands will be the better player. Nofa is all yours. Enjoy!
Hodgson WAS slow, weak and injury prone.
'Better' is a vague term. I don't know why you keep using it, though I have some ideas. To some of you idiots, 'better' means more popular. To others it just means it is supported by objective evidence. As you know, I'm not here to win any popularity contest. Neither are you, obviously, though you have taken it upon yourself to speak for the loudest dopes in this place. Maybe you're just a philanthropist?
I'm pretty sure it's only ever used around here about yourself, with your Single White Female levels of obsession with other posters.
He certainly wasn't weak, but like most players his age he was injury prone. He was always slow:
The only thing Hands has over Hodgson (other than the fact he isn't retired) is his speed. Which is why Hands was an inferior option.
None of our recruitment/retention choices hurt us last year. We had a weaker squad because we had fewer players on unders than in 2022. Then we underperformed because we had so many top 17 players unavailable. That wasn't the fault of our recruitment/retention team. If we'd kept Mahoney, Papali'i and Niukore we would've been significantly weaker in other areas of the squad. We were stronger in 2022 because we were paying those players less than they were worth. That's the only way we were able to fit them in the team in 2022 and not in 2023. Not because Hodgson came in and took all their combined salaries.
Misogyny as well?
