Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
But you are a victim, Pou... it's plain for all to see. You're so hard done by when people criticise your truly excellent fool proof "educational" posts!
)
Is it really? There’s clubs with more revenue than us who have missed the finals more often in recent years. I’d say the revenue stats only show part of the story. Resources means a lot more than income ffs
I doubt it’s going to show us anything we can use to effectively compare them with any other club, or else they would be included in that 15 team list of NRL clubs by revenue. The fact they weren’t included shows some relevant information is missing. This is where your lack of curiosity works against you. If there is publicly available information that allows a meaningful comparison of the Broncos and Storm with the other 15 clubs, why has it been omitted? Is it just coincidence that they are two of the more successful clubs in the NRL era?
But only one solution hey?
I'm talking about e.g. Using a win stat to defend a plodder and then refusing to use that stat to be applicable to someone who is clearly better than the plod you are currently defending. Recently, the Lussic /Hands debate.
I;ve learned a lot from reading your posts but also give a fair few a yeah nah.
It's probably not that subtle, I mean it's obvious to me but I'm not sitting here waiting to catch you out on anything either.
They don't mean well when they will happily lie to you about something to try and influence your opinion on something. Like saying that the Voice legislation was requested by the Aboriginal community when some basic research proves that the U.N. requested this legislation from a lot of western countries years ago.
Every club plays worse with their leaders out. I've given you examples. You're acting like it's only a problem for our club. The Storm's win rate dropped nearly 30% without Cam Smith. They lost by the record grand final score without him.
What if you don't have the best resources? What if you're only the fifth to seventh best resourced club? How do you compete with the other clubs for the people who know how to use the resources?
These are all lies
Then we're back to that one solution: sacking people. Eventually someone will pop off the front of the Centrelink line who knows what they're doing.
Win rate for players with so few games is a meaningless sample. Surely I've droned on about sample size enough times. Neither Lussick nor Hands have played enough games for their win rates to be relevant. Far more relevant is how few NRL games they've played for their age.
There are far too many unknowns for us to be certain about anything, so I'd hope we take each other with a grain of salt. What matters is showing our working. That's worth far more than the more common "Nah <so-and-so> is shit and you're a f**kwit for licking his nuts!" that we get from the rugby league cognoscenti.
Fair point. I've blocked the few bad faith actors on here. Most people are willing to discuss ideas without twisting my words or parroting those who do.
I'm not a leftie but I work in risk management, and I thought it was obvious the benefits of the vaccine far outweighed the risks. The virus was also "highly experimental" and "very dangerous" but vaccine-hesitant merkins were happy to catch it and spread it to others without full understanding of the consequences.
