hindy111
Post Whore
- Messages
- 62,867
Win rate for players with so few games is a meaningless sample. Surely I've droned on about sample size enough times. Neither Lussick nor Hands have played enough games for their win rates to be relevant. Far more relevant is how few NRL games they've played for their age.
There are far too many unknowns for us to be certain about anything, so I'd hope we take each other with a grain of salt. What matters is showing our working. That's worth far more than the more common "Nah <so-and-so> is shit and you're a f**kwit for licking his nuts!" that we get from the rugby league cognoscenti.
Fair point. I've blocked the few bad faith actors on here. Most people are willing to discuss ideas without twisting my words or parroting those who do.
I'm not a leftie but I work in risk management, and I thought it was obvious the benefits of the vaccine far outweighed the risks. The virus was also "highly experimental" and "very dangerous" but vaccine-hesitant merkins were happy to catch it and spread it to others without full understanding of the consequences.
The virus was an experiment I agree.