- Messages
- 65,786
unless we improve our back 5 signifacently, i can't see him being left out of the starting line up.
Even if he plays 14 for a spell, he will end up filling in across the backline when the inevitable injuries hit.unless we improve our back 5 signifacently, i can't see him being left out of the starting line up.
Well his next contract will not be as well paid, surely.I think he meant more along the lines of if he will stick around at the club if he’s given the 14 role.
Even if he plays 14 for a spell, he will end up filling in across the backline when the inevitable injuries hit.
Well his next contract will not be as well paid, surely.
I think one of Guthos big issues is that he tries to do too much. Hopefully Ryles can rein him in. Quality over quantity.The problem with Gutho is his lack of speed. This year he's gone from slower than average, to one of the slowest players in the competition. Which unfortunately means he's not able to be in the best position in defence, and limits his attack.
Gutho is a Hog, he takes a lot of good ball away from others.I think one of Guthos big issues is that he tries to do too much. Hopefully Ryles can rein him in. Quality over quantity.
Like our bookends, I believed Coach overused him and created the decline. I guess he feels a need to cover our backline sloths.
In Ryles we trust.
The Storm made four straight grand finals when they were caught cheating. That in itself is a fair sign something dodgy is going on. They then went on to make three grand finals in three years and four in five years (2016-2020). Are they suddenly not cheating? If they’re that good why bother cheating in the first place? I’m certain they’re still rorting the cap. They’ve just learnt to avoid getting caught. Another club that’s made four consecutive grand finals is Penrith.How many of those games were against a cheating Storm??? We might of won a comp or two. We never ever looked a contender under baldie, fluking a GF didn't change that.
He has a 100% win rate in preliminary finals and a 0% rate in grand finals, just like Anderson. All it proves is that sample size matters. Twelve games is meaningless.lol avoid the question. You said it’s harder to win finals games at Parramatta, not preliminary finals. What you should have said is its hard for Brad Arthur to win finals matches.
*Emu ExportSwan Larger for mine
But it’s harder to win finals games at Parra isn’t it? Or is it only harder for Arthur?He has a 100% win rate in preliminary finals and a 0% rate in grand finals, just like Anderson. All it proves is that sample size matters. Twelve games is meaningless.
It’s harder for anyone. We won six in eleven years before Arthur took over.But it’s harder to win finals games at Parra isn’t it? Or is it only harder for Arthur?
We were cheating the salary cap when we won spoons. We are now close to winning a spoon again so we must be cheating again. Is that how is works?The Storm made four straight grand finals when they were caught cheating. That in itself is a fair sign something dodgy is going on. They then went on to make three grand finals in three years and four in five years (2016-2020). Are they suddenly not cheating? If they’re that good why bother cheating in the first place? I’m certain they’re still rorting the cap. They’ve just learnt to avoid getting caught. Another club that’s made four consecutive grand finals is Penrith.
It worked out in 2016 for him, but it was a different game back then.What's Flanno doing? Putting together a squad full of a bunch of old men lol
Now you’re confusing correlation with causation.We were cheating the salary cap when we won spoons. We are now close to winning a spoon again so we must be cheating again. Is that how is works?
BingoNow you’re confusing correlation with causation.
It’s pretty obvious how cheating leads to success and not the other way around. Causality.Bingo
That’s just an assertion. You haven’t demonstrated it. You do that when you talk about our finals record as well and say things like and I’m paraphrasing “It’s hard for a club like ours to win preliminary finals matches”. You were right when you said correlation doesn’t necessarily equal causation so if you’re going to make these blanket statements you have to demonstrate how as well. Cherry picking data to baselessly make wild assertions isn’t the way.It’s pretty obvious how cheating leads to success and not the other way around. Causality.
Cheating being the cause of failure isn’t so explicable. In that case it’s just correlation.