God-King Dean
Immortal
- Messages
- 46,614
That would explain why you've lost 3 in a row.
Guess O'Meley is too lazy to do that 1 tackle or hitup.
Guess O'Meley is too lazy to do that 1 tackle or hitup.
Love your work RufusRex, excellent thread. As it happens I do have those very stats for the 2006 season.RufusRex said:sorry ... dont have the stats for last year but i would bet big dollars on Ryles making more metres and more tackles per game last year than Fatso
ShineDog said:O'Meley is 10 times the player Ryles is..
Compare to real props like O'Meley and Civoniceva.
O'Meley makes things happen, HE CAN CHANGE THE GAME WITH ONE TACKLE OR ONE GREAT HITUP.
Immortal said:That would explain why you've lost 3 in a row.
Guess O'Meley is too lazy to do that 1 tackle or hitup.
ShineDog said:Where do you get your facts from....last I heard Dogs won their last match.
ShineDog said:Where do you get your facts from....last I heard Dogs won their last match.
Immortal said:The " Ryles is soft " gang have gone a running.
grouch said:lmao A late entrance from the Ryles Is Soft brigade but oh boy was it worth the wait. Pathetic attempt badav.
ShineDog said:Ryles would play Premier League at the Bulldogs...maybe a bench spot.
grouch said:Learn the definition of the word 'fact'. Some facts earlier in this thread indicate Ryles was better than at least O'Meley last year. You're just spounting an opinion. Keep trying.
Red and Blue Knight said:Ryles is soft.
Perry is softer.
Hutty1986 said:Yes, soft as in one of the form props of the comp ;-)