Ultimately Griffin has had multiple years and a strong influence on recruitment and culture and in that time he has not been able to attract star players, create a winning culture, materially improve position on the ladder or create a team that performs consistently for 80 minutes.
The simple fact is the Dragons are not the Sharks or the Knights we are a proper sandstone club with history and we are one of the few, I would say only, Sydney clubs that acts with integrity and which does not sacrifice its long term brand value to the alter of short term performance. Look at Parramatta's run from its last premiership to now to see what happens when a club makes knee jerk reactions.
Poor decisions are what got us to the bottom half of the ladder and rushed ill considered decisions to buy the Sharks discards like Flanagan the cheat or others of his ilk will only further damage the brand and further ruin club culture at the later of short term success. Winning is momentary class is lasting.
Ultimately our board is acting openly and with integrity. Griffin is not a permanent employee he is a contractor with a fixed term contract who is remunerated annually into high six figures. He has no guarantee of employment beyond 2023 and is expected to perform professionally for the entire tenure of his contract. The club has not underpaid him with a future carrot or promised long term deals or in any way lead him on.
However, ultimately in a competitive based business the club is considering whether Griffin is worth a new contract given we are still in the bottom half of the ladder. The board has warned him that it is considering other candidates and has asked him to present to the board his vision for the future. Again not an unreasonable position, he has been warned with time to prepare that he will face a competitive process in order to receive a new contract and that he needs to present a new vision or strategy.
That is open and honest communication with a key employee who is not being surprised or having strategic decisions made behind his back. The criticism is coming because most other clubs do it in an underhanded fashion, sack coaches, make massive payouts and improvement is at best a 50/50 proposition and the press vultures like Kent and co are not used to a board acting fairly, openly and with integrity.
Instead of the normal football practice of publicly stating the board has confidence in the coach and then sacking him unawares after saying this multiple times our board has openly warned Griffin personally that it is unhappy with team performance and would like him to present a new strategy. Note they did this to him personally with time to prepare not through the usual press announcements or other faux processes.
Finally in all likelihood the press scrutiny has come about because it has been leaked by Griffin or his management so it is a bit cute to complain about press scrutiny when his entourage is likely the ones that made the press aware of it.
Ultimately somewhat belatedly our board has recognised that our current direction is not working and they working towards making a considered and strategic decision not simply a kneejerk one.
Whilst I am very critical of the board in terms of appointing and then extending Griffin, I can appreciate it was a desperate decision based on Wyane Bennet's acceptance of the head coach position on a long term deal which he reneged on
It is split milk and good leadership is about moving past problems and solving them and our board is doing that with integrity and planning to try and find the best available candidate in a considered and methodical manner.
Griffin can be unhappy, in fact as a leader in a competition based business I would be disappointed if he was not he is not a position to complain that he is being treated unfairly, being undermined or financially prejudiced. Ultimately he can either improve culture and make the team competitive and present a compelling strategic plan to the board (like any leader in business needs to do) or he will not receive a new contract.