Objective View
Bench
- Messages
- 2,639
Surprisingly, Mary didn't mention the two tries off kicks in the presser.
Oh wait, they were Dragons tries.
Straight Shooter
Oh wait, they were Dragons tries.
Straight Shooter
Shhh. You'll wake Lizzie the Moro..Dragon.Surprisingly, Mary didn't mention the two tries off kicks in the presser.
Oh wait, they were Dragons tries.
Straight Shooter
Is it true that the contract he signed had a clause , that if the team failed to make the eight it would become null and void?
Please let this be trueIs it true that the contract he signed had a clause , that if the team failed to make the eight it would become null and void?
I think that's a myth.Is it true that the contract he signed had a clause , that if the team failed to make the eight it would become null and void?
I will pray for common sense to prevail!I think that's a myth.
Tonight Doust is probably considering an extension. Afterall, Knights and Souths had a lot to play for. You laugh now...
Doust with common senseI will pray for common sense to prevail!
Knowing Doust he will use it to extend him on a salary of 50k a year and some lunch money.Is it true that the contract he signed had a clause , that if the team failed to make the eight it would become null and void?
In our case it would be a good start though.Yep we absolutely should be aiming higher. But I just don't believe that sacking Mary alone is the answer.
A premiership calibre halfback is a must, and as we saw on Sunday an attacking skilful fullback is imperative as well. We're slowly solving those problems.
People say they want to win a comp by sacking Mary, yet want to persist with Duges as fullback? If we really want to win a comp, this goes much further than the coach.
Just ask Hasler and the Dogs.