Thanks
@Willow and my response follows:
Indeed there doesn’t appear to be any point to the whole exercise!
I am not so sure that Gus appreciated the heightened sense of anger and anxiety of the ordinary sgi fan and member. That his involvement would be taken poorly by a large number of people unless of course he was open to examining the performance of the head coach.
Gus had the choice and opportunity not to become involved at all, he did not “ have to do what he was asked to do” in fact he should have recommended that they tender the exercise and seek recruitment specialists to propose a person who are not in any way compromised. Even then, an expert may not want to bite the hand that feeds them.
When the idea of a review was first floated at hq, someone somewhere should have insisted that the candidate should at the very least not have any meaningful connections with anybody at the club. This includes being a friend and former coach of the existing sgi coach.
Otherwise if the review not compromised by relationships, it certainly is by way of perception.
As to relationships, I was concerned when gus announced very early and that Mary was quite safe and change was not forthcoming.
The outcome so far suggests that there is and was no point to the whole exercise, when the leading figure in the debate remains in situ and untouchable.
At worst is was an attempt to get a result you want and at best, lazy and incompetent.
Given the resources thrown at retaining Mary, I believe it is the former. That the whole horrendous exercise seeks to legitimise his retention and is a pr disaster.
Once Mary has finished up, the club will recover and no one should abandon her long term.
Rightly or wrongly, Those are my thoughts at the moment.
The solution is obvious.