Roosters have an unfairly big market giving them an advantage
Roosters have no fans and a tiny area and are the least popular of 9 Sydney teams
There are too many Sydney teams constricting opportunities
...which is it?
Eels & a few other clubs have to follow the rules.
Eels fined for salary cap breaches
The Parramatta Eels are facing a fine of $525,000 for salary cap breaches last year.
The NRL issued a breach notice to the club on Thursday which also imposes a penalty of 4 competition points for breaches of the cap.
The competition points will be deducted at the start of the 2016 season unless the Eels undertake an independent review of its governance and organisational capability - and implement changes recommended by that review.
http://www.nrl.com/eels-fined-for-salary-cap-breaches/tabid/10874/newsid/86425/default.aspx
honestly how do they fit 1.5M under the cap when they would have had to upgrade players since winning the comp..
the changes to third party deals can't come soon enough.
Also why bother with a player who has no loyalty to anything but the dollar. The sooner rugby league moves on from these type players the better.
One thing I want to know. Has his contract been approved by the NRL?
Souths have admitted they will need to 'move some things around' I.e they need to make room in the salary cap. The NRL wouldnt accept hoppoates eels contract and forans initial one because it would put the eels over the cap.
Why than have they allowed Burgess's contract?
which makes following the rules is yet another thing the eels failed at..
Proves my point. The mistake there was thinking that just because others can do what they want, we can too.
Roosters have an unfairly big market giving them an advantage
Roosters have no fans and a tiny area and are the least popular of 9 Sydney teams
There are too many Sydney teams constricting opportunities
...which is it?
One thing I want to know. Has his contract been approved by the NRL?
Souths have admitted they will need to 'move some things around' I.e they need to make room in the salary cap. The NRL wouldnt accept hoppoates eels contract and forans initial one because it would put the eels over the cap.
Why than have they allowed Burgess's contract?
I thought the issue with Folau was the amount they wanted to register him for, not the cap situation?
John Lee said on Sky sports radio yesterday that they had made their intentions known to the NRL re creating space so I gather whoever is being released is 90% complete.
Actually the mistake was cheating the cap.
What other clubs do has zero to do with the Eels getting busted.
Sure, TPAs are unlimited and are perfectly legal under the current system. It is however, illegal for a club to source them for an individual, nor can they be used as an incentive to sign with a particular club or guaranteed by a club.
http://www.nrl.com/nrlhq/referencecentre/salarycap/tabid/10434/default.aspx
If Souths have been able to list 500k or there abouts of Sam's salary under the cap but Burgess is stand to earns over a million after TPAs, IMO it smells a little fishy to me especially if they do not have move on any talent because I am sure there would have been other clubs offering much more "guaranteed" money above and beyond the 500k. And as a complement to Sam, if Taupau is on 700k, Fifita on 650k and Graham on 750k, he is by far IMO a much more valuable player than any of those and should be "guaranteed" more money.