What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Semi Radradra wants to play for Australia

SJR

Juniors
Messages
24
Disappointing to hear this. Semi in my opinion should be playing for Fiji.

As has been said this exemplifies why the RLIF and APRLC need to get their act together and get an international schedule together.
 

hutch

First Grade
Messages
6,810
Needs to sit out 2 years not immediately qualify

Didnt he just play a Pacific Test

He can switch straight away, the precedent has been set many times. You can switch once within a World Cup cycle. Last year lolohea played for tonga and NZ and there are countless other examples. I'm pretty sure our sport just makes up the rules as they go.
 

RedVee

First Grade
Messages
6,082
This sucks. But if he is eligible and wants to do it he has to be allowed.
But he shouldn't be eligible.
 

hutch

First Grade
Messages
6,810
Mascord on the money as per usual. If only the NRL admin cared about growing the game.

http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/...d-of-international-sport-20160225-gn35a8.html

Eels winger Radradra wants to play for Australia
What is it about eligibility rules that fascinates a certain section of rugby league supporters so much?
When the Sydney Morning Herald broke the story about Parramatta's Semi Radradra wanting to play for Australia, I was deluged on Twitter.
Caught in the middle: Semi Radradra.
Caught in the middle: Semi Radradra. Photo: Getty Images
Perhaps eligibility rules are interesting because they represent how rugby league sees itself. They encapsulate the world view of officials in contrast to those of the game's supporters.
Advertisement

The first thing I'd like to say is that, as an individual, Semi Radradra has the right to put himself forward for any team he is properly entitled to represent.
In the new edition of Rugby League World magazine, colleague Gavin Willacy points out the Fiji Bati have played just twice since the 2013 World Cup semi-finals. Australia don't play too often either but they do pay much better - $20,000 a game.
He is not eligible for NSW because he did not live there before he was 13. From here on, the situation is very much about how the NRL and the Australian team sees themselves.
And the first problem is that they see themselves as indivisible. It's conceivable that some of the money the NRL derives from New Zealand broadcast rights is contributing to the wages of the new Australian coach, Mal Meninga.
How is this justifiable?
Brent Webb may have played for New Zealand and Rangi Chase for England but does Australia seriously need the residency rule to pick a national team?
On one hand Origin players are being banned from representing the so called "islands" but on the other "islanders" are supposedly about to be picked by Australia. It's the embodiment of having cake and eating it too.
Put another way … you cannot play Origin unless you commit to Australia but we'll let you play for Australia if you are not eligible for Origin.
Rules are rules but then there's policy and these policies on the part of Australia are abusive and about as far from statesmanlike as you can ever imagine.
Rugby league has a great opportunity to funnel talent back to developing countries at Test level and steal the march on other sports where economic migration has a decisive effect on the international balance of power. We can be the Robin Hood of international sport.
Australia should never use the residency rule to pick a player because Australia is the game's most powerful country and has an unfair economic advantage over everyone else.
Origin players should be permitted to represent other tier two countries for whom the properly qualify without changing their country of election.
Playing Origin should not tie you to Australia. Australia does not need the help of the $30,000-a-man to hoard talent.
The NRL should pay at least one $20,000 match fee per year to each player who represents another country – as they did for the Kiwis in last year's Anzac Test.
How do we have a Collective Bargaining Agreement that covers Australasians but not Fijians, Italians, Papuans and Lebanese? How is that worded?
Finally the Australian team should be run by an independent High Performance Unit and not the NRL. The NRL's role should be to fund the team but also keep it in line to protect the interests of the game worldwide, to which it has a moral responsibility as the peak club competition.
At the moment I am reminded of a 40-year-old friend a few Christmases back, bowling at 100 miles an hour at a six year old during a game of backyard cricket when I think of Australia's efforts to "make international rugby league great again".
Premier League is not there for the benefit of the England soccer team, The NBA is not there for the benefit of the US basketball team. The NRL should have the same independence given it contains players of all nationalities.
ARLC chairman John Grant should not read out the Australian team. The directors should not get around in green and gold scarves.
That's my world view. What's yours?


Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/...onal-sport-20160225-gn35a8.html#ixzz419jEbCaW
Follow us: @smh on Twitter | sydneymorningherald on Facebook
 

Sinman

Juniors
Messages
104
The issue here is that he is in no way Australian except for the fact that he plays NRL... When things like this happen it takes away all hope of competitive International Rugby League just simply because good players will play in the NRL and Australia will dominate because not only do they have the best from Australia.. they also get to pick the best from the rest of the world as well.. It's within the rules but it will make me even more so cheer on anyone who plays Australia..
 

hutch

First Grade
Messages
6,810
The issue here is that he is in no way Australian except for the fact that he plays NRL... When things like this happen it takes away all hope of competitive International Rugby League just simply because good players will play in the NRL and Australia will dominate because not only do they have the best from Australia.. they also get to pick the best from the rest of the world as well.. It's within the rules but it will make me even more so cheer on anyone who plays Australia..

Plus we have origin as an extra incentive to switch. England and NZ are just as bad, something needs to give in order for us to reach our potential as a sport.
 

deluded pom?

Coach
Messages
10,897
All the big 3 are interested in is beating each other and they'll do all that they can to achieve that regardless of how it affects the sport as a whole.
 

Rhino_NQ

Immortal
Messages
33,046
Can't see him not being selected either. For many brain dead selectors the first (and sometimes only) box to tick is whether the commentators donate semen every time he touches the ball regardless if it was actually good or not which semi is right up there on that list.
 

Billythekid

First Grade
Messages
6,579
This issue is basically an example of the league as a sport on the whole. Forever lacking vision and handicapping itself from whatever potential we may have. That's why the NRL still struggles to expand and why the international game forever goes nowhere. Sure we're taking baby steps but we simply aren't making the progress we should be.
 
Messages
14,248
This issue is basically an example of the league as a sport on the whole. Forever lacking vision and handicapping itself from whatever potential we may have. That's why the NRL still struggles to expand and why the international game forever goes nowhere. Sure we're taking baby steps but we simply aren't making the progress we should be.
Spot on :clap:
 

siv

First Grade
Messages
6,567
I think we need to address why Fiji isnt playing 3 to 6 tests every year first
 

franklin2323

Immortal
Messages
33,546
All the big 3 are interested in is beating each other and they'll do all that they can to achieve that regardless of how it affects the sport as a whole.

This is the issue. NZ will poach Islanders before the WC and England will no doubt get some Welsh and or Irish in their side. I see it as need more games for these minnows 1st of all then we can go about keeping their players atm there's no option but to switch if they want tests
 

siv

First Grade
Messages
6,567
We also need to introduce a 2 or 3 year waiting period to qualify for the big three
 

hutch

First Grade
Messages
6,810
This issue is basically an example of the league as a sport on the whole. Forever lacking vision and handicapping itself from whatever potential we may have. That's why the NRL still struggles to expand and why the international game forever goes nowhere. Sure we're taking baby steps but we simply aren't making the progress we should be.

Absolutely! Well said!
 

The Partisan

Guest
Messages
1,929
Extra cashola and extra exposure via 'high level' representative games is a core issue here.

Till we can find the miracle remedy to help all the nations outside the Big 3 ...we are going to have to live with this choking of International RL.
 

some11

Referee
Messages
23,396
The NRL season could easily be shortened by a few rounds to accommodate more internationals, match payments are another thing.

They should also open up Origin to those who are a product of the QRL or NSWRL being able to represent both the state they played their junior footy in and their birth country for internationals should they choose too, Origin is not about where you were born and never has been.
 

thorson1987

Coach
Messages
16,907
The NRL season could easily be shortened by a few rounds to accommodate more internationals, match payments are another thing.

They should also open up Origin to those who are a product of the QRL or NSWRL being able to represent both the state they played their junior footy in and their birth country for internationals should they choose too, Origin is not about where you were born and never has been.

Have no issue with that, provided the eligibility rules for SOO stay the same in regards to where you lived before you were 13.

So Radradra would still be ineligible for SOO.
 
Messages
17,744
Killing SOO would be beneficial in the long term but it will never happen. Can't get my head around playing for a nation thats not your own but i don't value money as high as most people.
 
Top