Have NFI why there is so much love for this bloke here. He sold you guys up the river. All of this was a storm in a fkn tea cup until irvine decided to give it legs by making offers to the players to accept bans, for sacking staff for doing nothing wrong etc. This is the bloke that has let the place run without a CEO. You should be glad to see the back of him. He IS the problem.
1. Explain how he sold the club up the river? The drugs mentioned may not even be illegal under the WADA code, but I agree it's not a good look. He has admitted that - BUT it doesn't necessarily indicate illegal activity by the club.
2. He sacked the staff - true. But what information do you have that says they have done nothing wrong? The fact you don't have any information about the case that isn't mere speculation shows you can not judge the decision. I don't necessarily agree with the sackings - but if what is speculated (that Dank had access to players without football department knowledge) is true, than that is a massive failure by the football department and would not be accepted in any sporting organisation.
3. The Sharks passed on the offers from ASADA to the players, also adding the incentive to ensure players could still earn a living. How dare they give players an option?! Everything else has been speculation that can not be verified.
4. We haven't had a CEO. But we have been travelling a lot better without one than our last couple. Ultimately it removed a single manager that the leagues club and footy club bosses reported to, instead the footy club boss and leagues club boss both reported to the bored. If we had a CEO, and this scenario had happened I hazard a guess that he would be sacked as well given what happened to the football club.
5. If Damian Irvine securing our financial future with the Development, working 24 hours a day for ZERO pay, and increasing membership at the club is a problem. Than I am happy with those problems.