Storms Light Fire
Juniors
- Messages
- 161
Don't shoot the messenger when they tell you the gospel truth.
You are missing the point. You can't stack teams because of the points system.
Whilst I understand and agree that people would try, how would they cheat it though?
Players points are calculated on a table available to players, managers and public.
Club point caps area available to all and sundry as well.
So anyone with a calculator can add up and see where a team stands.
Clubs don't get to say how much a player is worth.
Salary cap can go away.
One thing for certain is the current system is rooted.
Is it? We have just had the closest season on record with the top 8 teams all falling within 4 points of each other.
The salary cap has ensured that since the beginning of the NRL we have not had a back to back premiership. We've also managed to not lose any club due to financial issues despite close calls.
The salary cap is achieving exactly what it has intended. Aside from very few large breaches, it has kept teams at an equal level of competition.
Is it? We have just had the closest season on record with the top 8 teams all falling within 4 points of each other.
The salary cap has ensured that since the beginning of the NRL we have not had a back to back premiership. We've also managed to not lose any club due to financial issues despite close calls.
The salary cap is achieving exactly what it has intended. Aside from very few large breaches, it has kept teams at an equal level of competition.
Hope this scum club gets taken down. They should have been banned after the peptide scandal. Now salary cap??!! Take their 2016 Premiership off them. NOW!!!
But you can unless you limit the length of contracts.
If the points are determined at the start of the contract, there is no prevention from clubs signing young players to excessively long term and higher paid contracts so the points ultimately won't matter.
Teams will be stacked if there is no financial barrier preventing teams from attempting to do so.
At the beginning of a players contract with each Club, a set of independent arbitrators with significant knowledge of the game make a decision on how many points an individual player is worth based on the likely money paid and potential of that player.
The number of points a player gets is for the life of his contract (2, 3 or 4 years) so no matter how his form goes, he keeps that point score for the life of his contract, until he signs another one at which time his points score to the salary cap are re-looked at.
So a young player may sign a 3 year deal and be worth 4 points each year but his form might significantly improve over the life of the deal so the Club has got a bargain.
On the other hand, a Club might sign a perceived very good player for 3 years and be worth 7 points but that player doesn't fit in at the Club or his form deteriorates and therefore the Club has a dud.
Each year and with every new contract, these independent arbitrators make a decision on a contract by contract basis.
And when a Club gets up to a number of points; lets say 120 points for this example, it can't trade or buy any more players.
So every Club gets a total of 120 points and every player is evaluated every time the player signs a new contract.
So Munster might be a 4 point player on his current contract but when he signs his new contract, he is a 10 point player for the life of that contract.
so dd the Warriors and they lost 4 pointsSelf reported to the NRL in March after a internal governance review conducted new management team came into the club. This is how good management operates.
In addition to this, they have freely made all information available to the NRL prior to yesterdays 'breaking story'.
You can also judge greco roman wrestling as well the Melbourne Storm are great at that. lolI'm happy to have a go at it. I reckon I could do a fair job.
People judge diving, gymnastics etc etc.They find a way to get a levelling out of bias in other things. Have 7 people rate a player (who have not previously been involved with that Club so Darren Lockyer couldn't do Brisbane Broncos but could do all other Clubs etc), throw out the highest and lowest and then go with the average.
You assign a few factors to the point scoring inc the players actual contract, his ranking in position, SOO, number of games etc etc.
I reckon you could get a pretty consistent system up and running quite quickly.
he refused to help auditors after that and was banned by the NRLDidn't Gee disappear never to be seen again?
So a player on a particular level of points would be more likely to go to a richer club that can afford to pay more for a player at that level? Sounds to me like it would defeat the point of a salary cap. Not that the current system is working, of course.Doesn't need to.
Clubs can pay over if they want, but if they don't have the points which is clear to everyone then it is clear that they have a problem with getting/keeping that player.
After the conclusion of the investigation, Billy Slater has been awarded the 2016 premiership.
Cronulla got a long way to reach 3.85 million lolWe aren't the only ones. The Sharks are pretty good at it as well.