VictorTheViking
Bench
- Messages
- 4,007
The sharks, as I said earlier, were just too good, if they can keep defending like that against everyone they come up against, they'll be hard to stop come finals time.
imasharkie said:errr we've already beat the Panthers and the Stains this year mate.
VictorTheViking said:Your nothing more than a troll ink, every time there is a thread on the raiders, your in having a dig, every time there is a bad news report, your in having a dig, im willing to bet the only constructive posts you've ever made was when your side won in 2005.
Yeah sure, im a keyboard hero, insults, nothing more, blah blah blah blah blah, but at least I tell the truth in regards to you.
victor the viking said:but at least I tell the truth
victor the viking said:What is your point ink? I was having a go at you, the difference between what I said and what you and spike are saying about weyman is I was telling the truth, you are a f**kwit.
Raider_69 said::lol: ok then mate, play the man, not the ball... if you want to debate the matter, then come and see me, if you just want to piss about with petty name calling, im happy to let you take it up with someone else.
facts are simple, the score line does not reflect how poor the raiders were, the sharks should have put alot more points on us, and im sure Ricky Stuart will agree. You're defence was good enough to hold our extremely weak attack. If you think playing that level of football will win you a premiership, you are KIDDING yourself.
Yea thats tru mate however in more vital games i think we should hide noddy abit more so he doesnt get tired in attack, He really defended well tonightVictorTheViking said:The sharks, as I said earlier, were just too good, if they can keep defending like that against everyone they come up against, they'll be hard to stop come finals time.
BlaC_WIte_"N"_BlUE said:No one ever said they would win a premiership playing that footy, actually was premiership even mentioned. However it is a good way to get into gear for the rest of the season
innsaneink said:Last chance.
Please show what I said about Weyman.
Put up or stfu!
Raider_69 said:i dont think so at all, it was a good way to get 2 points playing pretty poor footy, but thats about it. As i said the sharks were far too good for us, but from purely a sharks point of view, if i were a fan id be very disappointed they couldnt do more with their chances in attack
Raider_69 said::lol: ok then mate, play the man, not the ball... if you want to debate the matter, then come and see me, if you just want to piss about with petty name calling, im happy to let you take it up with someone else.
facts are simple, the score line does not reflect how poor the raiders were, the sharks should have put alot more points on us, and im sure Ricky Stuart will agree. You're defence was good enough to hold our extremely weak attack. If you think playing that level of football will win you a premiership, you are KIDDING yourself.
Raider_69 said:i dont think so at all, it was a good way to get 2 points playing pretty poor footy, but thats about it. As i said the sharks were far too good for us, but from purely a sharks point of view, if i were a fan id be very disappointed they couldnt do more with their chances in attack
Errrr we were terrible tonight and still won, Our defence was good but not that good as the Raiders threw nothing at us.
Sheros los Deros said:You're not worth my time, little boy. Just my opinion, but you're going on like a whinging little child, crying over a loss. A hurt little child who is so pissed off at the loss, that they thrash their limp wrists about it, with flatulating comments criticisms about the opposition.
I've already posted my opinions about the match. A debate with a poor loser like you is pointless.
BlaC_WIte_"N"_BlUE said:Iv already stated that, anyway alot of our last passes didn't stick so in that aspect it was dissapointing the real test will come in the next 3 weeks.
Newcastle away
NZ away
Broncos home.
We will see where we stand from there but if we did play those other teams tonight we would of lost.
Still looks promising with strong defence tho
innsaneink said:Im sure theyre more happy with their defence, and their focus and commitment to their defence in keeping you out for 80, probably did take away from more attack from them.
Raider_69 said::lol: panthers and saints... i said big boys... wait till melbourne, the dogs, broncos alike hit their straps, when they do, if you blokes can beat them, ill happily conceed i was wrong.
Sheros los Deros said:Why would anyone give a rat's ass about your opinion? You're a whinging nobody. I have discussed my views on the Sharks chances this year with more intelligent posters on the Sharks site.
26-0. It's really hard for you isn't it? You lose so you hit out at, and try to demean the Sharks club. You're just a poor loser, just face it.
Raider_69 said:You keep responding to me, so ive got at least one bloke who gives a rats arse dont i?
:lol: :lol:
As i said, want to debate the matter, happy to do that, want to contiue on with petty name calling, then im sure you can find someone who will take you up.
Walt Flanigan said:Sh*t game all round. The only good aspect was the Sharks defence, the Raiders attack was nothing special but the Cronulla boys numbered up well and kept it up all night. If they can sort their attack out they'll be a force. The sad thing from the Raiders perspective is that this was their second best defensive effort thus far.