wtf is with people in this thread thinking that shortening the in-goals somehow means that the ad boards will move even closer to the action than what they were before when in fact they would be further away. I love how everyone puts shit on Bunniesman due to stupidity, but in this thread, he is Einstein.
FTR, it's not a bad idea at all.
I only entered this thread to vote that BM is an idiot.
Well if the rules say they can be 6 to 11m, to save another bloody rule change , just make them 6m across the board.
What cracks me up is the in-goals in rugby. Wasnt there 1 during the year about 15m?
For those that know Rugby, why are they so big?
4. For adult games the dimensions should be as near maximum as possible to the dimensions stipulated.
Dimensions Each NRL Competition venue playing surface will have the following dimensions:Width: 5.5 m
Field Width: 68m
Length: Goal line to goal line - 100m
In-goal areas - to messure 68m X 8m.
Goal posts: Height : 16m
Further shortening the in-goals also reduces your opportunities for repeat sets of six as it makes it much harded to get a grubber into the in goal and stop.
What cracks me up is the in-goals in rugby. Wasnt there 1 during the year about 15m?
For those that know Rugby, why are they so big?
Ps I'd shorten the current 8m to 5m and have a tap restart on the 30m line instead of 20m to discourage kicking on the last when close to the line.
Bunniesman isn't an idiot. He's brilliant. Not only is he full of good ideas, he speaks french. He translated "voulez vous coucher avec moi ce soir" for me. Did you know it means... "I want to touch your meat wand"?
That is hilarious.I dare say thats the only phrase he knows, but he can probably say it in 25 different languages.
Shit load of people who post on here seem to find League boring.