- Messages
- 35,819
It was forward. Get over it.
Again, RTS' pass is just about the least of our complaints.
It was forward. Get over it.
Almost as bad as the Warriors v Panthers game a few weeks beforehand
There's been some all-time whinging this week but the best has to be 'a flick pass has to go backwards'. It went 2 metres forward as he was getting tackled.
Conspiracy? Hell no. Incompetence? Abso-f**ken-lutely.
One of the strips was bloody hard to tell if there were two involved or not. Milliseconds after the second tackler let go.
You know it is really such a shame that the poor Warriors have been robbed of multiple premierships because of the referees.
Honestly, I haven't heard such incessant whinging since Thurston claiming there was a Sydney conspiracy.
I thought you were a ref? A ref would surely know what backwards out of the hands meant? I'd hope so, anyway..
The way he flicked it, yeah, he might have to have his elbow bent the wrong way for that to be forward out of the hand.
But I guess everything is taken in the strictest literal terms, unless it's you pretending that one person whinging about a conspiracy means anyone complaining about the standard of ref performances is also a conspiracy theorist?
-----
Anyway.. f**k me, the mental gymnastics some people will do...
Yes, it was a horrible performance from the officials. Yes, it's also been the case in a number of Warriors games (5? I doubt there's been a team involved in as many game resulting in apologies this season, in any case), resulting in an official apology... whatever good that does (none). All but one of those mistake ridden games involved the weight of mistakes going against the Warriors (the Panthers game being the obvious exception).
Small sample size + I imagine Warriors games often getting the lesser regarded officials because they're not a 'big' team, high on the ladder or play in prime time TV slots makes up the main cause for this, I'm guessing.
Conspiracy? Hell no. Incompetence? Abso-f**ken-lutely.
NRL refs are reffing a different sport, but it's not their own making. They are told how to ref in order to produce the best entertainment product possible.
Our own NRL referee development officer told us not to watch what the NRL refs do as they are refereeing to what the NRL tells them in order to produce a better TV entertainment product, not to the rules.
Interesting points.I'm an advocate of a slower ruck.
As long as all teams have the same opportunity.
A slower ruck does not equal a ruined game.
Give each team 2, or 3, or "x" amount of seconds from the call of "held" to the act of playing the ball.
Artificially slowing the ruck will eliminate a lot of the wrestling, encourage legs tackles instead of penalising them, encourage coaches to develop positive attacking plays instead of relying on touch footy supersonic ruck speed tactics.
What we are watching right now is a Bill Harrigan /Super League version of RL .
Not really an insult...............f**king little girls.
Lol, 'mental gymnastics some people will do' while trying to explain how a 2m forward pass is backwards.
I'm also a player and know quite easily how flick passes can go forward. The way he flicked it could quite easily end up with it going forward, which is what happened. And 2 metres forward is generous.
Look at it, his hand is facing the f**king sideline. His forward momentum is also significantly slowed as he is being tackled. He passes it and it goes forward, end of discussion. I mean I know rugby league fans have very little common sense but use your f**king brain.
If the geniuses were right about the way he flicked it meaning it had to go backwards, then the ball would have no chance of floating forward at all. If it is legitimately propelled backwards out of the back of the hand it would go backwards even with momentum, it's not like a regular two handed spiral pass. But he didn't, he passed it perpendicular to the sideline and it went forward. Get over it.
It was backwards out of the hand. Go look for yourself (I even attached a fun pic), but open the other eye this time. No wonder they say there's nobody better, if this is the standard of officials...
And let's not get caught up in one incident - because it was far from the only screw up they made - the game was full of them. That's why it got so much traction... it's not like the Warriors were ever a chance of playing finals footy regardless of the result.
Oh, and the "If the geniuses were right about the way he flicked it meaning it had to go backwards, then the ball would have no chance of floating forward at all." bit? Learn basic physics, moron.
Done with you. Bye.
You know it is really such a shame that the poor Warriors have been robbed of multiple premierships because of the referees.
Honestly, I haven't heard such incessant whinging since Thurston claiming there was a Sydney conspiracy.
There's been some all-time whinging this week but the best has to be 'a flick pass has to go backwards'. It went 2 metres forward as he was getting tackled.
Fun fact, only once in the last 6 matches have the Warriors conceded more penalties than their opposition. Yep, it's the refs alright.
f**king little girls.
Yep, I thinks this covers all Parra fans in this thread - although they could also be stupid and dishonest...If you don't think the Warriors have a right to be aggrieved by the refereeing on Saturday night, you're either stupid or dishonest.