What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Souffs Sydney nude video complaint

Chook Norris

First Grade
Messages
8,319
I think the Harvey witch hunt was way over the top

I don't disagree that parts have been over the top but you're dancing around the issue. If the player in question flashed himself over the phone to someone and it was not consensual - there is an issue.

Same way as if someone had exposed themselves in public to your mother, your sister or your daughter and it was not consensual.
 

PARRA_FAN

Coach
Messages
17,778
Yeah I noticed Kent changed his opinion slightly tonight when he and Tallis had a disagreement over it on Triple M. So what new information has come through to change the opinion?

There seems to be different stories about this. We probably won't know the full story until maybe this week.
 

Randwick Rabbit

Juniors
Messages
91
I don't disagree that parts have been over the top but you're dancing around the issue. If the player in question flashed himself over the phone to someone and it was not consensual - there is an issue.

Same way as if someone had exposed themselves in public to your mother, your sister or your daughter and it was not consensual.
But what IF it was consensual? How do we know for sure that during the "funny face time video" that she didn't ask for one or more of the guys to flash their frank n beans?
 

Chook Norris

First Grade
Messages
8,319
But what IF it was consensual? How do we know for sure that during the "funny face time video" that she didn't ask for one or more of the guys to flash their frank n beans?
I'm not declaring it was consensual or not. If it ends up being clearer that it was consensual then it becomes less of an issue, and it becomes a private family matter.

I was responding to an earlier comment that basically said "who cares" about the whole issue even when it remains unclear how consensual the situation was.
 

Randwick Rabbit

Juniors
Messages
91
I'm not declaring it was consensual or not. If it ends up being clearer that it was consensual then it becomes less of an issue, and it becomes a private family matter.

I was responding to an earlier comment that basically said "who cares" about the whole issue even when it remains unclear how consensual the situation was.
All good Chook.
 

BranVan3000

Coach
Messages
12,289
Yeah I noticed Kent changed his opinion slightly tonight when he and Tallis had a disagreement over it on Triple M. So what new information has come through to change the opinion?

There seems to be different stories about this. We probably won't know the full story until maybe this week.
Player in question lawyered up and contested the claims about it being non consensual

According to Webster’s article in SMH
 

AJB1102

First Grade
Messages
6,339
I don't disagree that parts have been over the top but you're dancing around the issue. If the player in question flashed himself over the phone to someone and it was not consensual - there is an issue.

Same way as if someone had exposed themselves in public to your mother, your sister or your daughter and it was not consensual.

No daughter or sister but if Mum's pulling footballers on Tinder f**ken good on her!
 

Cheap Charlie

Juniors
Messages
59
Bi
If it's not a police matter, it's not a matter at all.
no, apart from the vile behaviour of the journos that held onto this then beat it up, while not giving a sh!t about facts or evidence, and harassing a player’s wife into the bargain.

Lowlives.

Hope Souths ban News.
 

Danish

Referee
Messages
32,019
So does anyone see a lawsuit against the NRL by the bulldogs coming out of this?

I’m sure Manly would be happy to go in on it
 

Surely

Post Whore
Messages
101,915
I don't disagree that parts have been over the top but you're dancing around the issue. If the player in question flashed himself over the phone to someone and it was not consensual - there is an issue.

Same way as if someone had exposed themselves in public to your mother, your sister or your daughter and it was not consensual.


It's video not in person

If he starts taking his dick out and you don't want to see close the chat
 

Cockosh

Juniors
Messages
1,138
I’m not sure what leg Pearce would have had to stand on? He wasn’t nude, a minor or in his own private dwelling. The only person who could have prevented that filming was the owner of the apartment he was in. You don’t need consent while filmed in a public place where a matter of privacy is not expected, which is why the nudes of the Bulldogs mad Monday are not an issue
Ok so what leg would SB have to stand on. They haven’t identified him as the naked player, they just said his account was used which I believe they themselves have confirmed. They never said it was non consensual. Till this point they haven’t really accused him of anything. I think his brother said more when he said he had made a mistake.
 

Chook Norris

First Grade
Messages
8,319
It's video not in person

If he starts taking his dick out and you don't want to see close the chat

Classic victim blaming attitude - and people wonder why feminism is on the rise.

It is highly likely that she felt the need to take screenshots as substantive proof.
 

colly

Juniors
Messages
1,083
1.30 Today press conference , Burgess and 'others' are going to show 'their' side of the bacon. Tune in!
 

Pommy

Coach
Messages
14,657
Classic victim blaming attitude - and people wonder why feminism is on the rise.

It is highly likely that she felt the need to take screenshots as substantive proof.

Lol this hasn’t even been to court and there appears to be too sides of the story.

Yet you’re talking about victim blaming, who is the victim?
 

Latest posts

Top