Souffs Sydney nude video complaint

[T-Boon]

they need to be thrown from Mooney Mooney bridge.

 

[insert.pause]

Apparently the woman's follow up complaints got sent to Souffs email Spam folder..

Sounds plausible..

She allegedly used a temporary email account so chances are it would have been flagged.

 

[wittyfan]

I find it disturbing that @wittyfan is nowhere to be seen.

Lol! Been busy trying to find the pics.

 

[insert.pause]

Maybe I’m old fashioned, but I don’t understand how someone’s first reaction to being “traumatised” by being flashed is to take “many screenshots”.

If you are so disgusted, surely you end the chat immediately?

 

[Pommy]

If you are on tinder and don’t see dick pics are you really on tinder?

 

[mozza91]

It’s gone too far now. Better kick Manly out of the comp.

 

[Canard]

When is Sloth going to kill himself

 

[alexwilliams_66692007]

It’s gone too far now. Better kick Manly out of the comp.

It's the only logical solution

 

[Cockosh]

This sounds like another typical over reaction as was the case with Pearce and with the bulldogs last week. The problem now is precedence and as a fan I fully expect that the same punishment dealt to Pearce is dealt to these Souths players. Not because it fits the crime but because that was the standard set and must happen for sake of consistency. Which is exactly why it won’t happen. This is is the problem when rival fans start calling for the head of players from other clubs. It’s almost inevitable that someone from your club will make a mistake.

 

[TheVelourFog]

There are lots of people who do dickhead things like this in society, yet it only seems like in professional sport people think that the sports person's employer should do something about it. Why? My employer is not responsible for what I do outside of work hours on my own time on my own behalf. It would be one thing if I did something at a function where I was representing my employer, but if not, then it is not really my employer's business. If something wrong occurred in this matter, then in my opinion, the complaint should have gone to the police.

If it were part of your contract at work to adhere to certain expected public behaviours then yes, it would be your employers responsibility to act.

 

[Saxon]

Decapitation is the only way forward

Move them to Perth.

 

[carcharias]

Move them to Perth.

Then kick em out?

 

[mave]

This sounds like another typical over reaction as was the case with Pearce and with the bulldogs last week. The problem now is precedence and as a fan I fully expect that the same punishment dealt to Pearce is dealt to these Souths players. Not because it fits the crime but because that was the standard set and must happen for sake of consistency. Which is exactly why it won’t happen. This is is the problem when rival fans start calling for the head of players from other clubs. It’s almost inevitable that someone from your club will make a mistake.

The current problem actually started when a player was suspended for 4 weeks for allegedly being drunk at an official club function.

Every incident since then has had the overshadow of that precedence.....the NRL still pick and choose when they want to follow any precedence previously set though.

 

[kdalymc]

Pics or it didn’t happen

 

[Pommy]

If it were part of your contract at work to adhere to certain expected public behaviours then yes, it would be your employers responsibility to act.

Employers prerogative not responsibility.

 

[Zerô]

BREAKING

I've just been sent the screenshots which I will post below.

These are unsolicited dick pics, please view at your own discretion

 

[Willie Ray]

Paul Kent when this story hit the wire.

 

[dangerousdave]

Maybe I’m old fashioned, but I don’t understand how someone’s first reaction to being “traumatised” by being flashed is to take “many screenshots”.

If you are so disgusted, surely you end the chat immediately?

Ohhh good. Now we're being critical of her actions.

 

[Rhino_NQ]

Lol@souffs

 

[TheVelourFog]

Employers prerogative not responsibility.

sure, but failure to act would be seen as condoning