Haffa
Guest
- Messages
- 16,542
He lives in Gods Country these days and gets September off. What a life.No he's probably moved on with his life.
He lives in Gods Country these days and gets September off. What a life.No he's probably moved on with his life.
So is forming one of these "investigation committees" going to be standard practise when incidents occur from now on? Might as well shut down the Integrity Unit then.
BingoI’ll back Souths/NRL on this over a gossip ridden media that has gone silent in the outrage stakes which, IMO, speaks quite loudly to what has/hasn’t happened.
Maybe you missed the 2 NRL heavyweights on the committee.This is where I’m confused by the process. The “Investigation Committee” included the Souths Chairman, CEO and Head of Operations.
Shouldn’t it have been a totally independent body? Isn’t that what the Integrity Unit is for?
So it’s now seemingly back to the clubs to decide these things. I realise they had two NRL people on the committee but still 3/5ths were Souths people.
Maybe you missed the 2 NRL heavyweights on the committee.
And who else was expected to represent Souths in a matter of such gravity (albeit media-confected gravity)? The f**king’ groundsman??
Edit: correction. I see you acknowledged NRL presence. But my question is valid.
Blah blah blah, let's just ask a whole bunch of questions (that you could answer yourself if you actually bothered to use a search engine) in lieu of an actual real argument that there's been some miscarriage of justice here.Was Nick Politis or other Roosters officials allowed to be part of the process that resulted in the massive fines and suspensions in the Mitchell Pearce incident?
If not why not? Why is this different?
The Roosters reached an agreement with the NRL integrity unit this morning after 48 hours of negotiations.
...
“It was pleasing to see that Mitchell contacted our Chairman Nick Politis and suggested that the lengthy stint on the sideline was what he deserved.”
The penalties handed to the Dogs and Pearce were a damned disgrace. Over the top. Unwarranted by any reasonable consideration of the (claimed) sins.I’m just trying to understand the process.
Were Bulldogs officials allowed to sit in on whatever group or committee decided they should be fined half a million bucks or whatever it was?
Was Nick Politis or other Roosters officials allowed to be part of the process that resulted in the massive fines and suspensions in the Mitchell Pearce incident?
If not why not? Why is this different?
Hi Wally.
Bulldogs need a solicitor like Chris Murphy. I never understood when the NRL enforced their fine on the Bulldogs why a Sydney-based solicitor didn't advocate pro bono on their behalf simply for the publicity it would generate for their practice.
Mitchell Pearce must be sitting back, uttering "que?" at this whole process and how it's been handled compared to when he also did nothing wrong according to the law.
At some point the NRL/Clubs need to tell the media to FO and stop sensationalising some of this off field stuff.