Perth Red
Post Whore
- Messages
- 70,347
What? We've had one in WA since 2010!, its currently in hiatus due to covidBut Perth, Adelaide or Darwin dont have SG Ball teams
What? We've had one in WA since 2010!, its currently in hiatus due to covidBut Perth, Adelaide or Darwin dont have SG Ball teams
I have no doubts we would end up with same model with WA fielding Pirates teams in HM, SG and NSW cup as well as a partnership agreement with a Qlnd cup side or another NSW cup side. Below that we already have 26 WA clubs fielding Jnr sides and elite academies and Jnr rep sides playing each other.
Interestingly when the Reds joined in they went the other way and brought over dozens of young players to play in the WARL comp with the notion that they could strengthen the local comp to the level needed to be the feeder for the ARL team.
Thats why ideally with WA we'd have a 3-4 year lead in time from announcement. We are currently in a chicken abnd egg situation where we cant field HM and reserve grade without certainty of a club and yet some people think we need those to have the development pathways ready. We already have an alite U19's program, SG Ball when it resumes U15 academy and elite Jnr rep comp locally so its not like we are starting from scratch.you want those Matt guys ready to go in NRL when the side comes in. Because recruiting will be very hard
Buddy let’s no questions each other’s credentials bc it will make you look silly
I’m going to dumb this down for you
Perth maybe rich but it’s afl territory. It’s not like nrl can capture more than a small slice of the market there just like they have in Melbourne
as the storm have shown, the club won’t add much in the way of new tv viewers or growing tv audiences. In terms of adding new juniors it’s won’t be much either.
it’s literally just a pin in a map. And someone has to pay 100 million for that pin to srurvive and it won’t be the arlc.
like I said the team will have a terrible roi
rather than copying afl and putting teams into place that aren’t wanted the arlc should look at place where they can expand too that will actually grow the sport meaningfully
Thats why ideally with WA we'd have a 3-4 year lead in time from announcement. We are currently in a chicken abnd egg situation where we cant field HM and reserve grade without certainty of a club and yet some people think we need those to have the development pathways ready. We already have an alite U19's program, SG Ball when it resumes U15 academy and elite Jnr rep comp locally so its not like we are starting from scratch.
But like I said Dolphins have all those things well established and still are signing all their first grade players from the other clubs. No way any team can start off with just its own reserve grade stepping up.
Recruiting could be made easier but needs the NRL to get off its 'everyone is equal' box.
Perth offersThe timezone is about all a Perth bid has. NZ 2 should be team 18.
Perth offers
- new time zone; a new frontier
- new fans, new corporate money
- A national footprint for sponsors and advertisers … you know, the merkins who pay for, and make money out of, rugby league
- a million plus new fans
- junior growth area
- an area with 75 years history
ticks all the boxes imho
Aside from a reserve grade side what pathways do you think we dont currently have? We have U15's, U18's U19s programs.GC didn't have pathways in place. Now are paying for it
Dolphins are having issues getting a decent FG squad but have the pathways in place
Not sure what you mean by business? Generally businesses are corporate supporters who come on board when an opportunity arises. Its not Japan where businesses own sports clubs.Has anyone in business actually asked for a team from there? I have yet to see it.
A few former players have said but have to see the Business case because the recent expansion have been failures imo
Has anyone in business actually asked for a team from there? I have yet to see it.
A few former players have said but have to see the Business case because the recent expansion have been failures imo
Its been reported there are three potential owners. Also heard on the grapevine a Qlnd/WA based mining company is lined up as first main sponsor but cant say how true that is.There have been reports of it i.e private backers wanting to put money into it if it was approved. Make of that what you will.
Also the previous expansion sides to Perth and Adelaide didn’t fail, so much as they weren’t given an opportunity to succeed. If after 10-20 years, they fell by the wayside like Gold Coast, Newtown or Wests, then you could call it a failure.
Perth has a history of producing well run sporting clubs that are successful. Scorchers in cricket. Wildcats in basketball. Eagles and Dockers in fumbleball. Glory in sooker. I'm sure they can put together a rugby league team that will add clout and prestige to our game id not hampered by a toxic Sydney-centric administration, like the one run by Arthurson and Quayle.Its been reported there are three potential owners. Also heard on the grapevine a Qlnd/WA based mining company is lined up as first main sponsor but cant say how true that is.
This story from over ten years ago now had at the time a number of companies lined up to sponsor.
Western Australia’s bid team claim they’d be among the highest sponsorship-earning NRL clubs within two years if admitted to the competition.
WARL chief executive John Sackson said about $4 million worth of company sponsorship commitments were already on the table and one of them was prepared to commit $1.5 million to be the team’s major sponsor.
Despite having only been able to sell “hopes and dreams” at this stage, McManis said the interest shown by the business community made them believe the club would be very profitable.
“We’ve had a bit of a roadshow around some of the corporates of Perth, particularly the top end of town,” he said.
“If we’re awarded a licence, we anticipate we could go close to being the highest sponsor-earning NRL club in our first two years.”
Perth has a history of producing well run sporting clubs that are successful. Scorchers in cricket. Wildcats in basketball. Eagles and Dockers in fumbleball. Glory in sooker. I'm sure they can put together a rugby league team that will add clout and prestige to our game id not hampered by a toxic Sydney-centric administration, like the one run by Arthurson and Quayle.
Once Perth is in we will only absent in Adelaide. I think NZ 2 and 3 should be ahead of Adelaide. I know NZ 3 is a long way from even being contemplated, but if we want rugby league to grow in NZ then it's a necessity and should be provided assistance from the NZRL and ARLC. The last thing onionball wants is three local NRL teams providing pathways to local talent to play in the world's largest "rugby" competition without having to move out of the country. 108 players spread across 3 teams would be great for NZ.
Auckland. Wellington. Christchurch.Totally agree. Adelaide is a bit different to Perth in a sense that there is not as much as economic benefit (SA’s economy pales into comparison to WA’s) and migration from NSW and QLD into SA is nowhere near as pronounced. I’m not saying that there could never be a side, there is just not as many positives as Perth. Hopefully one day though.
On the NZ aspect, the most pressing issue is where do you spread the three sides? It may have already been discussed (and apologies if it has been) but I’m sure one of our antipodean neighbours would know.
Auckland. Wellington. Christchurch.
Maybe 2 or 3 teams can be added to the Queensland Cup.Wellington is not real big though. It wouldn’t be much bigger than say Townsville
Uh Arko and Quayle were the ones who put a Perth team in the arl. It was news ltd who killed them off and moved them to Melbourne.Perth has a history of producing well run sporting clubs that are successful. Scorchers in cricket. Wildcats in basketball. Eagles and Dockers in fumbleball. Glory in sooker. I'm sure they can put together a rugby league team that will add clout and prestige to our game id not hampered by a toxic Sydney-centric administration, like the one run by Arthurson and Quayle.
Once Perth is in we will only absent in Adelaide. I think NZ 2 and 3 should be ahead of Adelaide. I know NZ 3 is a long way from even being contemplated, but if we want rugby league to grow in NZ then it's a necessity and should be provided assistance from the NZRL and ARLC. The last thing onionball wants is three local NRL teams providing pathways to local talent to play in the world's largest "rugby" competition without having to move out of the country. 108 players spread across 3 teams would be great for NZ.
Arthurson and Quayle forced all four expansion sides to cover travel and accommodation costs for the broke-arse Sydney clubs across first grade and reserve grade. It bankrupted the clubs and was incredibly discriminatory. Cowboys, Reds and Warriors jumped ship to Super League to get away from this discriminatory practice. Super League didn't want the Crushers so they were f**ked. The sooks who whinge about Super League should shut up and be grateful their Sydney clubs were never treated so poorly. If the Sydney-centric ARL didn't treat non-Sydney clubs with so much contempt then there wouldn't have been a Super League War.Uh Arko and Quayle were the ones who put a Perth team in the arl. It was news ltd who killed them off and moved them to Melbourne.
and the Perth union side that was a major failure
Maybe 2 or 3 teams can be added to the Queensland Cup.
Based in ChristchurchAuckland. Wellington. Christchurch.