I don’t think anyone is suggesting going to 20 anytime soon. Perth next in 2027. Then nz2 in 2032 then either adelaide or brisbane3, whichever makes most sense, in 2035 would be something like possible.
Exactly. You can plan for 20 teams over the next 10-15 years.
You can do this by attacking RU and looking at Pacific talent (we only have about 20 or so players born in the Pacific which is an incredibly small number really considering it should be a goldmine for talent, investing/funding in junior talent properly, fixing inequities with the salary cap etc.
This post is full of so many contradictions.
If people from central coast already have a side then so do the dolphins
so did the broncos
So did the cowboys
You can’t be this silly can you. The point of capitalism is that people can only actively consume a product when they have access to it or have a choice. Active support means buying memberships, attending games etc.
Even if I were a supporter of the Broncos pre Cowboys, it’s not like I am going to fly down from Cairns/Townsville to watch the Broncos thousands of miles away (at least very often). So distance and access is a problem.
If I’m in Brisbane and I don’t like the Broncos, I’m not going to attend Broncos games and buy a Broncos membership am I? Choice is a problem.
In either of these cases I’m not detracting from Brisbane’s active supporter base because I don’t have access to the product or there is very little choice given to me.
In the CC example, I live an hour away from Sydney and Newcastle. I have the ability to actively consume a product of any one of 10 clubs. If I follow the game, I already follow a club and I’m much more likely to be an active supporter because I have choice and I have access to the product.