Old Timer
Coach
- Messages
- 18,164
As I said before every case should be treated as individual and not because of who succeeded or didn't succeed on prior occasions.Funnily out of the many, many dragons juniors in recent years who haven’t gone to our top grades, how many are we truly ruing letting go?
Cook? People were glad to see the back of him, he’s only bloomed recently.
Bird? The jury is still out there..
And then when these juniors do get a shot in 1st grade with us and take the inevitable learning curve that comes with it, the same “fans” crucify the players
Eg in recent years Dufty was our saviour when he was in reserves and suddenly he’s no good..
Let’s not forget even someone like Latrell Mitchell had many clangers early on..
I’m tipping Lomax starts copping it on here before the end of next season too..
You are..
Its a bit like the welfare system do we stop payments to all because some cheat the system or should every case be judged on an individual basis?
Unfortunately some people focus on the cheats and ignore the needy.
We can't ignore any person we invest time in (save behavioural issues) on the basis of "the majority don't make it and neither will you" basis and especially so when Latimore, Allgood, Nicholls, Maranta have been able to wear our jumper and in doing so didn't alter the result of a game or the position on the ladder where we finished.
If the nuffies who are given our jumper (despite being long proven to be ineffectual) did make a difference to results then the arguement re their selection doesn't carry nearly as much weight but when we lose with them making no discernible difference and young people with potential upside are not given their shot and then ultimately leave the club we do have a right to bitch about it without any reference to those that may have gone before them.
Every player on his own merit.