- Messages
- 46,392
Losing Lussick means we really have to run with Stone / Smith at hooker, neither are good for eighty mins there, but we have no other option, but that means we lose a bench spot for a forward, with little to no cover for if we lose a back, ( we use Marata, but then need another edge player as well ) because Smith will be needed to play decent minutes at DH, and stone will likely rotate and give Nrown a rest.
Lane covers middle and edge, as does Papali'i, I'm guessing that's why Lane ahead of Matterson. Maka and Oregon being our only other options at middle, Oregan wasn't healthy after a knock against the Penny's, so there might be concern there. That leaves our middle a little short if we pick Matterson over Lane, particularly if we get an injury or HIA to a middle, or an edge, Ideally Matterson plays edge, Lussick plays eighty, but no Lussick so that's where it's at.
As for resting Lussick last week, hindsight is 20/20, but the merkin needed game time far more than he needed a rest, given the minutes he's played this year, why the f**k would you rest him other than to protect him?
Lane covers middle and edge, as does Papali'i, I'm guessing that's why Lane ahead of Matterson. Maka and Oregon being our only other options at middle, Oregan wasn't healthy after a knock against the Penny's, so there might be concern there. That leaves our middle a little short if we pick Matterson over Lane, particularly if we get an injury or HIA to a middle, or an edge, Ideally Matterson plays edge, Lussick plays eighty, but no Lussick so that's where it's at.
As for resting Lussick last week, hindsight is 20/20, but the merkin needed game time far more than he needed a rest, given the minutes he's played this year, why the f**k would you rest him other than to protect him?