i said you waxed silly, as in waxing lyrical, as in you had a lot to say. take a deep breath and read it again, lol. i respect your opinion on anything rugby league history.I can't accept your argument that Johns was without peer during his career.
He had to be shifted to Hooker for 10 of his 23 games for Australia to accommodate Geoff Toovey, Allan Langer and Brett Kimmorley.
That alone shows that he wasn't without peer.
And don't pull that condescending bullshit on me regarding my comments about Thompson. If you bothered to do any reading and talking to former players you'd know full f**king well what I was on about. Just because you're too lazy to do any of that isn't justification for you to call my opinion silly.
Alfie wasn't without peer either. I thought Stuart played better than him in the green and gold for example and Sterlo and Mortimer hold as much weight as Alfie does. Meninga was a better captain imo. I agree Alf would be considered. IMO he did as much for QLD and the Broncos as Lockyer has done, maybe more and I think Lockyer would need to wait until Langer gets a gig first.TBH......I'd have Alfie before Meninga & Johns.
nope, none of those hookers were as good as Johns was in that position, and none of them were in as good a form as Toovey or Kimmorley were at the time. Kimmorley in particular was so red hot it was ridiculous, fitting them both in the team made perfect sense, and worked well too. you couldn't exactly play Kimmorley anywhere else, though.I don't need to read it again, if he was peerless as you say, than Toovey would have played hooker and Johns would have been halfback.
truth is, he wasn't peerless like you said. That bullshit about him being the best available hooker at the time is nonsense that Knights fans drag up to justify the fact that he wasn't 'peerless'
Gower, Goddard, Hetherington, Buderus, Aaron Raper etc not good enough eh?
I'd have no problem with Lockyer becoming an Immortal in the class after Johns.
The two best players of the modern era should be there, in the rightful order.
WTf is with the poll? Provan and Irvine so good they had to be mentioned twice? Who is Stirling?
I can't accept your argument that Johns was without peer during his career.
He had to be shifted to Hooker for 10 of his 23 games for Australia to accommodate Geoff Toovey, Allan Langer and Brett Kimmorley.
That alone shows that he wasn't without peer.
You have fogotten why.I don't need to read it again, if he was peerless as you say, than Toovey would have played hooker and Johns would have been halfback.
truth is, he wasn't peerless like you said. That bullshit about him being the best available hooker at the time is nonsense that Knights fans drag up to justify the fact that he wasn't 'peerless'
Gower, Goddard, Hetherington, Buderus, Aaron Raper etc not good enough eh?
he was shifted to hooker because he was the best hooker we had available, and we had other halfbacks that were in form. it's a testament to his ability that he was able to play both positions at rep level.