What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

The 8th immortal?

Who's your 8th immortal?


  • Total voters
    248
  • Poll closed .

perverse

Referee
Messages
26,766
I can't accept your argument that Johns was without peer during his career.

He had to be shifted to Hooker for 10 of his 23 games for Australia to accommodate Geoff Toovey, Allan Langer and Brett Kimmorley.

That alone shows that he wasn't without peer.

And don't pull that condescending bullshit on me regarding my comments about Thompson. If you bothered to do any reading and talking to former players you'd know full f**king well what I was on about. Just because you're too lazy to do any of that isn't justification for you to call my opinion silly.
i said you waxed silly, as in waxing lyrical, as in you had a lot to say. take a deep breath and read it again, lol. i respect your opinion on anything rugby league history.

he was shifted to hooker because he was the best hooker we had available, and we had other halfbacks that were in form. it's a testament to his ability that he was able to play both positions at rep level. i'm sure you remember as well as i do that that when Johns was selected behind Kimmorley, that Johns was the star when on the field, not Kimmorley regardless of whether it was in the 9 or even the 14 jersey. when Johns was on the field, NSW did their damage. also unlike the players you have mentioned, Johns maintained the rage his entire career - at least when fit he was always Andrew Johns, and always a massive threat. you can microanalyze his game against any of the 3 you named and he is heads and shoulders above. rep selection really doesn't hold infinite weight when comparing players.

and you make a very poignant point, too. i have to read and research to know anything about Thompson, whereas Johns is the best almost anyone alive can remember seeing play. as far as immortals go, that holds a lot of weight in and of itself.
 
Last edited:

Jack De Ripper

Juniors
Messages
464
The bloke who played 284 games for his club, 19 games for NSW, 14 games for Australia.

He captained/coached his team to 4 premierships as well as playing in 10 consecutive premiership winning teams.

The NSWRL already immortalised him with Arthur Summonds and the NRL/ARL named him in teh 2nd row of leagues Team of the Century.

He even took the Sharks to a Grand Final as coach.
 

madunit

Super Moderator
Staff member
Messages
62,358
I don't need to read it again, if he was peerless as you say, than Toovey would have played hooker and Johns would have been halfback.

truth is, he wasn't peerless like you said. That bullshit about him being the best available hooker at the time is nonsense that Knights fans drag up to justify the fact that he wasn't 'peerless'

Gower, Goddard, Hetherington, Buderus, Aaron Raper etc not good enough eh?
 

typicalfan

Coach
Messages
15,488
TBH......I'd have Alfie before Meninga & Johns.
Alfie wasn't without peer either. I thought Stuart played better than him in the green and gold for example and Sterlo and Mortimer hold as much weight as Alfie does. Meninga was a better captain imo. I agree Alf would be considered. IMO he did as much for QLD and the Broncos as Lockyer has done, maybe more and I think Lockyer would need to wait until Langer gets a gig first.

I wouldn't mind Johns, Lockyer or Alf. Johns and Alf at their best were amazing and Lockyers longevity and his games in the green and gold, especially at fullback are worthy of mention.

I think Mal will get it next.
 

perverse

Referee
Messages
26,766
I don't need to read it again, if he was peerless as you say, than Toovey would have played hooker and Johns would have been halfback.

truth is, he wasn't peerless like you said. That bullshit about him being the best available hooker at the time is nonsense that Knights fans drag up to justify the fact that he wasn't 'peerless'

Gower, Goddard, Hetherington, Buderus, Aaron Raper etc not good enough eh?
nope, none of those hookers were as good as Johns was in that position, and none of them were in as good a form as Toovey or Kimmorley were at the time. Kimmorley in particular was so red hot it was ridiculous, fitting them both in the team made perfect sense, and worked well too. you couldn't exactly play Kimmorley anywhere else, though.
 

nqboy

First Grade
Messages
8,914
WTf is with the poll? Provan and Irvine so good they had to be mentioned twice? Who is Stirling?

Wasn't there an article the other day saying it btw Provan, Meninga, Johns, Fittler and Langer? Was that the real deal or some journos lazy-ass take on it?

Regardless, Provan and/or Messenger for mine.
 

Loudstrat

Coach
Messages
15,224
I'd have no problem with Lockyer becoming an Immortal in the class after Johns.

The two best players of the modern era should be there, in the rightful order.

Anyone who has seen a player better than Joey must have taken more drugs than Joey. Heather had about half his skills, and never took the line on nearly as much - hence his longer career.

Sterlo should get a gong before Heather. And so should Hindy.
 

TheDalek079

Bench
Messages
4,432
WTf is with the poll? Provan and Irvine so good they had to be mentioned twice? Who is Stirling?

haters-gonna-hate.jpg




Sterlo was a typo, and i didn't realise that sticks and irvine were listed twice:oops:
 

Saint Doc

Coach
Messages
11,101
More the record Norm Provan appears twice in the poll and if you add them together is coming second behind Joey
 

LESStar58

Referee
Messages
25,496
I voted for Alfie but it will most likely go to Irvine, Coote, Barnes or Provan (who I never saw play) or they will do the blatantly obvious and give it to Johns. Sterling and Langer should be Immortals before that prat IMO.
 
Messages
12,740
I can't accept your argument that Johns was without peer during his career.

He had to be shifted to Hooker for 10 of his 23 games for Australia to accommodate Geoff Toovey, Allan Langer and Brett Kimmorley.

That alone shows that he wasn't without peer.

That's a very good point Unit. Johns has also been straight up dropped from rep teams before. He also came off the bench for NSW in 2000 and only won 2 series at halfback - 03 & 05. And he only got picked in 05 due to injury.
 

Loudstrat

Coach
Messages
15,224
I don't need to read it again, if he was peerless as you say, than Toovey would have played hooker and Johns would have been halfback.

truth is, he wasn't peerless like you said. That bullshit about him being the best available hooker at the time is nonsense that Knights fans drag up to justify the fact that he wasn't 'peerless'

Gower, Goddard, Hetherington, Buderus, Aaron Raper etc not good enough eh?
You have fogotten why.

Chris Anderson was test coach. He had said that Noddy - his lovechild, was going to be test half. From memory Junior Pearce was Blues coach, who thought it no point that Joey be half if he want going to be test half. So Junior played him at hooker to give him a shot at test footy that he deserved. Joey blitzed it.

To say it was because Joey wasnt the best half ignores the truth.
 
Messages
12,740
he was shifted to hooker because he was the best hooker we had available, and we had other halfbacks that were in form. it's a testament to his ability that he was able to play both positions at rep level.

LOL wrong, wrong, wrong.

Remember the Anzac test in 99 when Johns only got called into the side cos the original hooker Gower showed some girl his wang in a pub?
 

Latest posts

Top