- Messages
- 28,154
AFL system is the way to go, no loss in profits infact probably more due to the more even match ups.
griff said:But the problem with McIntyre is that each game does not have the same thing on the line for both teams. And each team doesn't have their own destiny in their own hands, it also depends on the way other results go.
But lose and depending on what happens elsewhere, you may or may not still be around. Manly should have gone in last night knowing that if they win, x will happen, and if they lose, y will happen.The_Savage_1 said:of course they do, win and you advance!
Teams 3 and 4 get a semi in the other system too (as well as the second chance). They are guaranteed a home semi in week 2 or week 3. If they win away in week 1 they play their week 3 preliminary final at home. If they lose away in week 1 they play their week 2 elimination final at home. In fact in the system currently used in the AFL, teams 1 and 2 are guaranteed two home semis, teams 3-6 are guaranteed one semi, and teams 7 and 8 quite rightly get bugger all.sheldy said:i would rather have the mcintyre system because even if teams 3 and 4 dont get a second chance they still get a home semi.
El Diablo said:why do people call it the AFL system?
we used it in 95 and 96
griff said:But lose and depending on what happens elsewhere, you may or may not still be around. Manly should have gone in last night knowing that if they win, x will happen, and if they lose, y will happen.
borat said:This is like freakin groundhog day!!! As stated earlier the ARL had the current AFL system in 95/96 and the AFL had the MacIntrye. Rugby League supporters complained and wanted MacIntrye because the only advantage you get for coming first over scraping into 4th is you play at home. The following year we adopted the MacIntyre, which duely rewards the top 2 teams, and AFL took our system.
Neither is perfect but MacIntyre is certainly better.
And Dynamic Rooster as far as your system goes, why the hell would any team want to finish 1st over 3rd when 1st has to play 4th but 3rd gets 6th?
I am pretty sure this system causes teams to play each other twice before grandfinal.Dynamic Rooster said:i dont like either of the systems both have there ups and downs i have made my own what do u think
week 1
1 v 4
2 v 5
3 v 6
Highest ranked winner gets week off,
2nd highest ranked winner gets home semi-final.
7 v 8 loser eliminated
week 2
semi 1
2nd Highest ranked winner V 3rd highest ranked loser
semi 2
3rd highest ranked winner V 2nd highest ranked loser
semi 3
4th highest ranked winner V Highest ranked loser
LOSERS ELIMINATED
WEEK 3
prelim final 1
Highest ranked winner V Winner of semi-final 2
prelim final 2
Winner of semi-final 3 V Winner of semi-final 1
losers of both games out
week 4
GRAND FINAL
Winner of preliminary final1 V Winner of preliminary final 2