Mike Gibson and Greg Martin..a pair of disgraces.
Gibson: "The Rebels are are outdrawing the Melbourne Storm"
Greg Martin: "The Melbourne Storm only get about a 14,000 average, The Rebels are averaging 16-17,000 every game".
Martin: "See you get all those Kiwis and they'd rather support rugby than league...they'd been supporting the Storm and now they go..'Christ we've got ourselves a team'"
It was a big wank session on how good the Melbourne Rebels are going and these tossers were saying they were drawing better crowds than the Waratahs and Storm.
Nothing like the facts hey guys.
I'd say there still a bit of novelty value with the rebels. The storm would play more games in year so total figure would still be greater for the storm. Let's not forget TV figures as well.
But I have noticed that show has become an AFL lovefest
In before the merge.
Kent is programmed to only acknowledge rugby league players/officials, boxers/officials and his direct superiors.
And to write what Ricky Stuart is thinking.
And to hate every last thing about Manly.
(Mostly the last one.)
I think Kent rubs a lot of people the wrong way.
I didn't notice what you did, but have noticed over the past year or so Kent and Billy having a few swipes at each other.
A lot of people don't like Kent. But he's a straight shooter, and he gets paid to have a controversial opinion and stir shit up.
I thought it was more Stevens who virtually sat for 40 mins with his back towards Kent.
He did the same when he was on previously.
I wouldnt give Billy the time of day either. He serves no purpose on the show whatsoever. He is a "comedian" (i use that term loosely) living off something he did 20 yrs plus ago.
I would prefer journos on that show who are not afraid to air their opinon whether we agree with it or not.
Do you guys like anything??