The Crockett debate

[Timmah]

Well, this looks set to cause close to as much crap as the SBW/AJ incident in Round 1.

Having seen the tackle, what do you think Crockett shoudl get?

 

[lockyno1]

1-2 weeks max, if anything at all. Total stupidity from the ref to be honest. Not worth a send off, SBW's wasn't either IMO

 

[Mr Saab]

Zero weeks.

Most prob get 1-2 so that the video ref Phil Cooley doesnt look like the git he is by ordering his send off.....and for those that think he didnt, you are deluding yourselves.

 

[Earl]

I'm not voting, because IMO he shouldn't be suspended, and the didn't by any stretch of the imagination deserve to be sent off.

 

[Manu Vatuvei]

0 weeks, same as Sonny should have got

This whole thing is just beyond a farce. It's as obvious as obvious that both got sent off because of injury suffered by the recipient. The send-off alone was excessive punishment in both cases, but I'm sure the judiciary will do the same as it did with SBW and endorse incompetent refs by handing out a ban.

 

[Fast Eddie]

Neither sendings offs were warranted.

Anyway a sending off is worse than a one/two week suspension.

 

[BWNB]

The ref should of been sent off for that call!

 

[Timmah]

I'm saying two weeks only for the fact Sonny's tackle had set a precedent.

In terms of what he deserves, given the send off, I'd say one week at an absolute max. They can always bring Vatuvei back :sarcasm:

 

[Jobdog]

I'm not voting, because IMO he shouldn't be suspended, and the didn't by any stretch of the imagination deserve to be sent off.

 

[KeepingTheFaith]

Sonny didn't deserve a send off, Crockett didn't deserve a send off, Mr Bean deserves an uppercut.

 

[Fast Eddie]

I'm saying two weeks only for the fact Sonny's tackle had set a precedent.

In terms of what he deserves, given the send off, I'd say one week at an absolute max. They can always bring Vatuvei back :sarcasm:

But the question was how many weeks do you think he should get.

 

[Timmah]

True. He should get 0 weeks, as should have Sonny in Round 1.

I (probably silly) based my vote on what I think would happen using the NRL judiciary's (limited) brain power and the precedent set - not necessarily my opinion.

 

[Pumba]

I with Earl i'm not voting he shouldn't have been sent off.

 

[Special K]

He shouldn't get anything but they'll give him 1 to try and save face for the send off.

 

[hineyrulz]

Send off sufficient, Bumsteads desicion already probably cost he's side the 2 points. SBW's was not a send off offense either.

 

[Dr Crane]

If he wasn't sent off and only put on report like he should have been, one week at worst.

As it is, nothing.

 

[Charlie124]

3+ weeks.

voting is fun.

 

[CrazyEel]

Should not have been sent off IMO

 

[jimmy_the_greek]

I dont think he should have been sent off.

 

[Tonearm Terrorwrist]

crockett should be given 0 weeks

hampstead 3+