El Diablo
Post Whore
- Messages
- 94,107
CrazyEel said:Should not have been sent off IMO
agreed
CrazyEel said:Should not have been sent off IMO
>zuzu< said:In 2006 - On report, 1-2 weeks
In 2007 - Precedent set by AJ/SBW, send off and 2-3 weeks
CrazyEel said:Should not have been sent off IMO
Dodger said:To those in the "he shouldn't have been sent off" crew, think about it.
HE WAS SENT OFF and that can't be changed now. That was the initial punishment. The question is now... was that sufficient penalty or does he deserve further suspension?
The poll isn't about what should have happened, it's about what should happen in the FUTURE.
STFU DodgerDodger said:To those in the "he shouldn't have been sent off" crew, think about it.
HE WAS SENT OFF and that can't be changed now. That was the initial punishment. The question is now... was that sufficient penalty or does he deserve further suspension?
The poll isn't about what should have happened, it's about what should happen in the FUTURE.
Your fault for putting up a dodgy poll :lol:Dodger said:To those in the "he shouldn't have been sent off" crew, think about it.
HE WAS SENT OFF and that can't be changed now. That was the initial punishment. The question is now... was that sufficient penalty or does he deserve further suspension?
The poll isn't about what should have happened, it's about what should happen in the FUTURE.
bluey said:That bloke that got kimmorley with a high elbow last night was worse