Souths are sponsored by Crown Resorts, Star Casino’s only competitor. Maybe they should have signed Jack to a four year deal from January to October each year.
On notional value did they apply that to the Cheese for taking unders to go to the Roosters or Munster to remain at the Storm? Or does notional value only apply to some clubs?
I find it odd that Canberra registered a contract with the NRL. What did they register? An unsigned contract that only one party agreed to? They could have put any value on it (it doesn’t mean that becomes the notional value).
I may have my Crown/Star mixed up, but regardless, the point still stands around ways around the cap, and that’s what Kent was insinuating was happening here. I’m not saying it’s happening, but there’s clearly ways and means for it to happen.
And yes, we’ve heard of players taking ‘unders’ before, but not sure there’s been many examples of $300k per year, for 4 years style unders… that’s why this has caught the interest of so many - the clubs involved are irrelevant. And clearly, Jack taking such significant unders to leave a club that he has been at for so long, rightfully raises eyebrows - it doesn’t really seem feasible, particularly when you throw in the significant increase in cost of living in Sydney.
It doesn’t pass the pub test. I don’t really care personally, infact if anything, I think it’s really good - on the one hand, I think the Raiders have dodged a 4 year at $1.1m for a pretty average 5/8 bullet, but it still leaves them in a massive hole as they’ve got money to burn, but nobody half decent to chase with it (or likely willing to move to Canberra and play under Sticky), and Souths will be paying £800k for a centre who’s as dumb as a plank, and has a risk of going off the rails in Sydney, and taking his mate Trell down with him.
For all non-Raider or a Souths fans, this could be delightful!