The rise and fall of Tim Sheens...

[851]

He shouldnt have been on the bench in the first place.

Why you would carry a specialist half into a test match against a team with a MASSIVE forward pack is beyond me.

Although - and I detest Sheens - dont get me wrong - but does he select the test team?

No he should not have been there from the get go,another Sheen's master piece,please retire you fool

 

[moller]

Webster seems to write an anti-Tigers article every other week. Hack.

 

[innsaneink]

Webster seems to write an anti-Tigers article every other week. Hack.

Its not a Tigers article.

 

[benched tiger]

It just seems hard to justify DCE on the bench,Thurston and Cronk are the halves,if either one was injured
Boyd or Inglis could of than filled in at 5/8,that would allowed for another outside back or utility player to be on the bench.Being rated as the third best half should not gain you entry into the Australian test side.

 

[moller]

Its not a Tigers article.

Anti-Sheens, part of the same family.
At least have a go at him for one of the real issues (rather than a garbage sob story) - plenty of which have been mentioned on here.

 

[N.C.]

That's the point though, moller. For an untouchable, he's starting to cop a bit more heat now that someone other than you and me have rated his team... But he's still an untouchable for the time being. We will see where the rest of this season takes us.