V
Vasilevsky
Guest
No, he hasn't made 3 errors in 3 games. He has made at least 3 huge errors in his last 3 games and the same f**king error!
I didn't say the facts would be "life changing" but facts nonetheless
.
Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
.
No, he hasn't made 3 errors in 3 games. He has made at least 3 huge errors in his last 3 games and the same f**king error!
I didn't say the facts would be "life changing" but facts nonetheless
round 4 will be your first win....against my woeful mob lol
You won't get many arguments on this forum Exsilium. People have been saying the same thing for years - we nearly always look better as a team when the second hooker comes on.Sure, you've had a couple poor games and that fills these threads to the brim but whilst some say it's Widdop, Benji, lack of speed or the astute coaching of Mary McGregor, one thing seems to baffle me. Why do you persist with Mitch Rein. The guy is woeful. Let's break it down a little, only cause it's late and I hate typing on a phone.
Firstly, every backline movement, forward roll on, decoy running play or any set of six for that matter starts when the ball leaves the hands of your nine. If the pass is forward or the service is poor then your forwards will be flat and most often they will be pummelled by the defence because that extra second rein takes to think or move out of dummy half, which he must think is lightning quick, is allowing the defence to make that extra metre or so. This nullifies any depth, decoy run or movement in the play.
When he passes it's a lob or some where near the receiving players hips, head or feet. When he fakes to one side and then goes the other it's so predictable and slow. More often than not he chooses the wrong direction.
He has no kicking game from dh either so there's some attack gone.
When his service is slow, your backline has no chance to get ball with some space or depth in the line.
He has his moments but i just think he negates your attack and stifles any play by being shit 90% of the time. Your attack looked better and sharper with L'Estrange. Why? Because he did his job, provided service and let the others do their jobs.
Buy anyone else and you'll improve.
Sure, you've had a couple poor games and that fills these threads to the brim but whilst some say it's Widdop, Benji, lack of speed or the astute coaching of Mary McGregor, one thing seems to baffle me. Why do you persist with Mitch Rein. The guy is woeful. Let's break it down a little, only cause it's late and I hate typing on a phone.
Firstly, every backline movement, forward roll on, decoy running play or any set of six for that matter starts when the ball leaves the hands of your nine. If the pass is forward or the service is poor then your forwards will be flat and most often they will be pummelled by the defence because that extra second rein takes to think or move out of dummy half, which he must think is lightning quick, is allowing the defence to make that extra metre or so. This nullifies any depth, decoy run or movement in the play.
When he passes it's a lob or some where near the receiving players hips, head or feet. When he fakes to one side and then goes the other it's so predictable and slow. More often than not he chooses the wrong direction.
He has no kicking game from dh either so there's some attack gone.
When his service is slow, your backline has no chance to get ball with some space or depth in the line.
He has his moments but i just think he negates your attack and stifles any play by being shit 90% of the time. Your attack looked better and sharper with L'Estrange. Why? Because he did his job, provided service and let the others do their jobs.
Buy anyone else and you'll improve.
