The old guard will kick and scream about 'Americanisation', but rugby league needs to be played in quarters. For the extra TV revenue if nothing else.
Expansion doesn't necessarily have to put a 'strain' on a comp. If done right, it can do the opposite and bring even more value. I think Perth and another Brisbane team would do this.
Just as long as the NRL doesn't go down the AFL path and put expansion teams in already saturated markets and into areas that don't really need or want a team.
AFL expansion into the GC and western Sydney will go down in history as one of the most misguided ventures in Australian sporting history.
I would not have a major problem with this as long as it was a very short break (less than 2 mins) near the 20 min mark, in a natural break in the game (a scrum for example). I would also like to see its implementation correspond with a reduction of the interchange to allow us to keep the gladatorial aspect of out game.
That's probably how it will go and also with a slight extension at half time.
Play that as double headers with buffers between matches and you've increase your ad time significantly without being noticable.
The only concern I would have is a situational concern. For example, a team is dominating possession by forcing drop outs during the lead up to the 20 min mark. I'd hate to see the defending team get a 2min break in this time, I would like to see the ref use some discretion and call the break when this period ends, ie a mistake from the attacking team or a restart from the defending team after they successfully repel the attack.
The players would just need to be mindful of the game clock like they are with halftime. I daresay we'd see a lot more opportunistic field goals as the whistle approaches.
What would also be good would be better clock management - the clock stopping automatically whenever the ball is out of play and so on. That would make the games longer and go some way to countering the effect extra breaks will have on player attrition.
The old guard will kick and scream about 'Americanisation', but rugby league needs to be played in quarters. For the extra TV revenue if nothing else.
I'm all for change, but the old heads shouldn't be ignored. Change isn't always best.
I agree mate, which is why I'm all for keeping the game at 80 minutes but play it in quarters and stop the clock more often. The games would be a bit longer in real time but I doubt the fans would really notice.
I would not have a major problem with this as long as it was a very short break (less than 2 mins) near the 20 min mark, in a natural break in the game (a scrum for example).
The new TV deal, increased memberships and increased marketing exposure will bring the NRL close to parity.
In that short break, I will go to the dunny & get a beer.
It would be more hygenic to keep your beer in the kitchen fridge.