What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

The TV rights thread

Who would you like to see get the rights providing the price is right?

  • Seven

    Votes: 57 20.5%
  • Nine

    Votes: 49 17.6%
  • Ten

    Votes: 110 39.6%
  • Rights split between FTA channels

    Votes: 147 52.9%

  • Total voters
    278
Status
Not open for further replies.

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/bus...o-before-cabinet/story-e6frg996-1225933533445

Regime governing TV sports rights to go before cabinet

* Michael Bodey and Geoff Elliott
* From: The Australian
* October 04, 2010 12:00AM

THE new regime governing sports rights on TV could be settled this month.

The new Gillard cabinet is set to receive a submission on the new rules within three weeks.

Communications Minister Stephen Conroy, basking in the glow of his team Collingwood's Premiership victory, will hold meetings with key stakeholders, expected to include all TV networks and major sporting bodies, in coming weeks to clarify final positions, although one executive noted "it's all done and dusted."

The AFL and NRL in particular are keen to accelerate the process to further negotiations for new broadcast deals beyond 2012 that could net $1 billion each.

The so-called anti-siphoning regime governs which sports are seen on free-to-air and pay-TV. The list expires at the end of the year, making it a matter of urgency for the Gillard government.

The process is also critical commercially. Prime-time TV viewing has arrested declines and is showing better trends this year, helped by new multi-channels which have become a new variable in TV sports rights.

For consumers, key changes are likely to include more live AFL broadcasts, particularly on Friday night, Twenty20 cricket being added to the anti-siphoning list along with Socceroos World Cup qualifying matches, therefore ensuring free-to-air broadcast on Seven, Nine or Ten.

While Fox Sports has a lucrative agreement with the Football Federation of Australia, it is believed Fox Sports is prepared to deal with a free-to-air, or FTA, network to delay broadcasts or hold replay rights within the current deal.

As compensation for more flexible FTA arrangements, and in response to major sporting bodies requesting greater flexibility in selling broadcast rights, it is expected suites of AFL or NRL matches will be available to be bought by subscription TV providers, such as Foxtel (25 per cent owned by News Limited, publisher of The Australian) or Premier Media Group (co-owned by News Corp, Consolidated Press and the Seven Network).

Under the major changed provision, the "use it or lose it" policy is expected to be instituted, with broadcasters having to show key A-list events live or forfeit them.

Nevertheless, it is expected the free-to-air networks will be allowed to broadcast sport on multi-channels, which may go some way to explaining the establishment of Seven's male-skewed multi-channel 7Mate.

It is not known whether there will be an "all-sport" policy for multi-channels; rather it is expected a catalogue of A-list events that must be broadcast in full on main FTA channels with a B list of events able to be screened, perhaps only in part, on multi-channels in concert with some main FTA-channel coverage.

Networks Seven, Nine and Ten were silent on the imminent changes yesterday, with a Ten spokeswoman noting only that last week's Commonwealth Games amendment to the anti-siphoning regime was "a positive sign of what might happen".

The Ten Network was a beneficiary of existing regulatory provisions last week when the Gillard government granted the network permission to show some Commonwealth Games coverage first on its digital channel, One HD. The deal was allowed after consultation with co-broadcaster of the Commonwealth Games, Foxtel. The Ten Network had been proceeding and programming on that basis weeks before the announcement.

The government granted a similar exemption to SBS for its World Cup soccer coverage last year.

The anti-siphoning list of more than 1300 sporting events to which FTA networks have first rights is also likely to be significantly shortened based largely on what has or has not been broadcast on the FTA channels
 

roopy

Referee
Messages
27,980
Speculation in the papers today that James Packer is making a play for the 10 network.

If that comes off, and it could because the Canadian biggest shareholder in 10 dumped them during the GFC, so there isn't a major shareholder really, it will make the negotiations for the next TV contract interesting.

The Packer family have always gone hard for the big sports, especially cricket and league, and James will want league you would think.
 

IanG

Coach
Messages
17,807
Is he like his old man in that scene? I had the impression that Jamie was more interested in casinos. Mind you anything's possible. So if he does buy a major stake in the Ten Network perhaps could cricket go over there too when the current deal with Nine expires? Especially as they have an all Sports channel and analogue will be a thing of the past by then
 

simostorm

Bench
Messages
4,511
Packer's a goose.. and so is his network.. Having him own 10 also.. what a joke..

Im now hoping 7 get the league rights..
 

roopy

Referee
Messages
27,980
Packer's a goose.. and so is his network.. Having him own 10 also.. what a joke..

Im now hoping 7 get the league rights..
He sold 9 years ago.

He currently doesn't own any media assets i think, except the 15% of 10 he has supposedly been trying to pick up over the last few days.
 

roopy

Referee
Messages
27,980
Messages
21,880
He sold 9 years ago.

He currently doesn't own any media assets i think, except the 15% of 10 he has supposedly been trying to pick up over the last few days.


He owns 50% of Consolidated media , which owns , 25% of foxtel , Fox sports & Fuel TV.

and now 15% of the ten network.
 

roopy

Referee
Messages
27,980
I don't care who gets it as long as they pay a lot and show a lot of games in prime time to get their money back.
3 networks trying hard for the rights is the ideal situation.
 
Messages
21,880
This is great news for the NRL though , It means there may well be another serious player for the TV rights.

Channel ten as it stands really doesnt have the money for a big play at the TV rights. Now hopefully they may have the backing to have a serious dig at them.

I'm sure the value of rugby league isnt lost on packer , especially given his ownership of Fox Sports.
 

docbrown

Coach
Messages
11,842
What's more messed up though is that Channel 7 owns about 20% of Consolidated Media & through them portions of Fox & Fox Sports - so 7 now owns about 3% of Ten.

The relationship between Packer, Murdoch Jnr and Kerry Stokes is very different to the Rupert/Kerry era.

It wouldn't surprise me if 7, 10 & Fox Sports conspire to block 9 out of both the NRL & AFL rights.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top