Perth Red
Post Whore
- Messages
- 69,489
there's no guarantees they'll televise games at appropriate times or even on their primary channels...
there is if you put it in the contract (and make the barstewards stick to the contract!)
there's no guarantees they'll televise games at appropriate times or even on their primary channels...
Cant afford $15 a week but can afford broadband internet love to know how that works out.
Deadset anyone on here without foxtel and claiming to be a league fan is kidding themselves.
How anyone could prefer Free To Advertise(FTA) Tv coverage over Pay TV is quite simply beyond me.
Bunch of f**king gimps in this thread and nothing else.
You've just brought a tear to Rupert's eye.
That's what he wanted right from the word go.
A true believer.
Cant afford $15 a week but can afford broadband internet love to know how that works out.
Deadset anyone on here without foxtel and claiming to be a league fan is kidding themselves.
How anyone could prefer Free To Advertise(FTA) Tv coverage over Pay TV is quite simply beyond me.
Bunch of f**king gimps in this thread and nothing else.
Cant afford $15 a week but can afford broadband internet love to know how that works out.
Deadset anyone on here without foxtel and claiming to be a league fan is kidding themselves.
How anyone could prefer Free To Advertise(FTA) Tv coverage over Pay TV is quite simply beyond me.
Bunch of f**king gimps in this thread and nothing else.
TV rights are the AFL's main source of revenue. Current arrangements expire next year and the next deal is tipped to bring in more than $1 billion a year.
bullsh*t!!
I admit yeah Fox Sports coverage is good but I think it's a f**kin' rort that you have to pay extra for the channel I'd want. I'd only want the Fox Sports Channels and Fox 8 for the wrestling. THAT'S IT! I don't give a bugger about Sci-Fi or Home Shopping.
Cant afford $15 a week but can afford broadband internet love to know how that works out.
Deadset anyone on here without foxtel and claiming to be a league fan is kidding themselves.
How anyone could prefer Free To Advertise(FTA) Tv coverage over Pay TV is quite simply beyond me.
Bunch of f**king gimps in this thread and nothing else.
Don't forget other income that we currently miss out on such as this $12mill a year AFL get which we don;t:
compared to:
Did anyone see Harold Mitchell on the Offsiders yesterday? Old Harold fessed up to creating the $1b figure for the AFL.
I heard that. That's a big improvement to early this year. Last time they had old Harold on, he said Rugby League wouldn't get an upgrade.Yeah I saw that. They were very carefull to point out that AFL will get more. Still the figures they put up were positive for league.
AFL - $1 billion
NRL - $850m - $1 billion
Channel 10 is to start up a new channel soon (11). Getting rid of One HD shouldn't make much difference. I wonder what Channel 7 thinks about the speculation of Sky News broadcasting on Channel 10. Considering they are a part owner of Sky News?Jeeze that Packer stuff about getting rid of Onehd isn't looking good. Does sound like a way of protecting pay tv.
Harold is a Union twat and part of the new Super 15 team
wouldn't listen to a word the twat said
"Also, what's developing is that mums want their kids to play soccer. They don't like thuggery, so it's perfectly positioned as a family sport.
"It's minimal contact, of high appeal and it is a fast-moving game for TV, plus it's short."