The Dodger
First Grade
- Messages
- 6,065
juanfarkall said:not the "non-trier".
you mean the quarter back?
juanfarkall said:not the "non-trier".
As much as I value the information you provide the forum SLE, your opinion sucks. Dykes is a very creative player!Sideline Eye said:Dykes is not the best creating half, although I do rate him, he is quite an individualist.
If dykes was the best half at the sharks, why did we let Parra sign him a few years ago???
Sideline Eye said:he is about to ask for a release, upgrade wasn't as good as expected, sharks move fast!
Surely:
All this Kearney love, he is an ok player, but can someone please remind me what the f**k he did for us this year.
Like how many line breaks, how many try assists, he looks fairly average to me.
Since 73 said:Shirley you can't be serious.
Yaaawwn. I'll just repeat the obvious.
Bk was average in 2004.
BK was extremely dissappointing in 2005.
BK was woeful in 2006.
We are gone if he is within cooee of our number 7 shirt in 2007.
We would be be camped in the other sides quarter for 100 tackles a game this year and he had absolutely no idea how to get us over the line.
His try assists would be the worst in the league for a halfback this year.
Sherwin, Johns and co showed on the weekend it's teams with good kicking games that threaten in this game we follow.
Noddy's kicking game has deserted him.
We lost our last 10 games from 10 starts.
We came third last.
He was our halfback.
Anybody who considers him playing there again next year after those stats is making a late charge for the 'Beau Scott Award'.
cheese said:but anyone who "likes" the idea of kimmorley steering the ship, SLE included, are either f**king deluded or masochists
Surely:
I'm sorry I think you will find I was talking about Kearney not Kimmorely
imasharkie said:All I want for christmas is my Sharks team in 2007 less Nobby & Supercoach.