What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

The world's gayest nation

salivor

First Grade
Messages
9,804
Did any of you guys read goangods proposal? A person signs a form that when they die their body can be used for a week of necrophilia action :lol: . Really who is being harmed goangod? Nobody, I morally object to it but I dare not bring that up because I know exactly where I can shove them. So if I can't morally object to it I can't see any other grounds, no abuse involved so let them go for it.
 

Anonymous

Juniors
Messages
46
Moffo said:
Willow said:
goangod said:
salivor said:
Tell me who is being harmed by necrophilia? If a sane, mature adult wishes to consent to such a proposal as you put forward, just who is being harmed?

Before I get to the rest of your post (tonight), I just want to make sure everyone reads this so they know how you think.

I'm trying to argue homosexuality is unnatural to someone who thinks having sex with corpses is A-Ok. :roll:

Brook, Thierry, e2w,Willow, Millers, Moffo - I take it you all agree with this logic??
I thought it was pretty funny.
Necrophilia is OK as long as its between consenting adults. :lol:

how can they consent if their dead? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

\\:D/ \\:D/ \\:D/ \\:D/ \\:D/ \\:D/

Cheers,
Moffo
Thank you Moffo.
eusa_clap.gif
 

Moffo

Referee
Messages
23,986
salivor said:
Did any of you guys read goangods proposal? A person signs a form that when they die their body can be used for a week of necrophilia action :lol: . Really who is being harmed goangod? Nobody, I morally object to it but I dare not bring that up because I know exactly where I can shove them. So if I can't morally object to it I can't see any other grounds, no abuse involved so let them go for it.

disease?

Why would you want a pork a corpse anyway?
 

Anonymous

Juniors
Messages
46
goangod said:
Which I think is totally incorrect. De facto benefits and no fault divorce laws should both go.

I've got to ask again about this. Its looks even more weird in the light of day. Goangod is obviously against people who choose to 'live in sin.'

Definition conundrums aside... what exactly do you mean by 'defacto benefits'...?
 

salivor

First Grade
Messages
9,804
Moffo said:
salivor said:
Did any of you guys read goangods proposal? A person signs a form that when they die their body can be used for a week of necrophilia action :lol: . Really who is being harmed goangod? Nobody, I morally object to it but I dare not bring that up because I know exactly where I can shove them. So if I can't morally object to it I can't see any other grounds, no abuse involved so let them go for it.

disease?

Why would you want a pork a corpse anyway?

Moffo, I think your a little confused here. Your supposed to be fighting against me, not giving me ideas to throw back at goangod ;-) .
 

ozcrusader

Bench
Messages
4,915
salivor said:
Did any of you guys read goangods proposal? A person signs a form that when they die their body can be used for a week of necrophilia action :lol: .

lol.
I really shouldnt be doing this at work.
However, the case I presented to Salivor was if a person consented before they die, the same way people now allow their bodies to be used for scientific research after their death.

Really who is being harmed goangod? Nobody, I morally object to it but I dare not bring that up because I know exactly where I can shove them. So if I can't morally object to it I can't see any other grounds, no abuse involved so let them go for it.

Exactly.
Therefore, do you now concede that once we dispense with the moral injunctions against homosexuality, we therefore must allow bizzarre sexual practices (such as necrophilia)?
 

JoeD

First Grade
Messages
7,056
This thread has gone on way too long. Moffo and Sal have been arguing all this time about whether gay men are inherently more feminine than straight men. It would be funny if it hadn't gone on so long and become boring.
Goangod - it seems your main objection to homosexuality is that it is the first step on the slippery slope to pedophilia and necrophilia, amongst other things. Do you have any other arguments besides this one? Can you explain what is wrong with homosexuality without mentioning pedophilia? ie what in itself is wrong with homosexuality? Be specific. You often talk about the 'promotion' of the homosexual lifestyle. Who is doing this promoting beside gay people? Do you think this promotion actually encourages people to be switch from being straight to being gay? You have also pointed out that there are certain health risks to be homosexual. Even if this is true - there are certain health risks involved with rugby league, mountain climbing, sky diving, skiing - yet these are all promoted as a healthy past times.
 

salivor

First Grade
Messages
9,804
goangod said:
salivor said:
Did any of you guys read goangods proposal? A person signs a form that when they die their body can be used for a week of necrophilia action :lol: .

lol.
I really shouldnt be doing this at work.
However, the case I presented to Salivor was if a person consented before they die, the same way people now allow their bodies to be used for scientific research after their death.

Really who is being harmed goangod? Nobody, I morally object to it but I dare not bring that up because I know exactly where I can shove them. So if I can't morally object to it I can't see any other grounds, no abuse involved so let them go for it.

Exactly.
Therefore, do you now concede that once we dispense with the moral injunctions against homosexuality, we therefore must allow bizzarre sexual practices (such as necrophilia)?

Its like talking to a broken record goangod. As we've already established, we have no right to impose our morals on others. I don't concede anything. Allowing homosexuality is not going to lead to paedophilia (child abuse), beastiality (animal abuse) or incest (chance of birth defects), I've already given you reasons why. I'm sure though we should get rid of homosexuality because hypothetically necrophilia could gain support and some people may be crazy enough to give up their bodies in death :lol: .
 

Terminator

First Grade
Messages
6,303
If anyone here thinks theres nothing wrong with someone sticking a corpse, because its not hurting anyone, try telling that one to your kids, its not going to hurt them is it, the corpse has no say in it, its done hopefully out of public view(Ive heard some pretty sick stuff about the Glebe morgue).
You won't tell your kids of course because its sick and perverted, something like this getting legitimised one day, would hurt our society, because our government, who we look up to to lead us, has approved a discusting activity, it hurts us as a nation.
Legitimising Homosexuality, and probably paedophilia in a few years time in some format is hurting our society.
Society's are not built on same sex marriages, it is a poor building block for a family as well.
The ancient Romans as mentioned earlier, were aware of perversions in their society, but never condoned it as normal behavior, they never legitimised it as normal behavior.
The Ancient Greeks were a randy bunch, but they never legitimised homosexuality or paedophilia or necrophilia either.
 

salivor

First Grade
Messages
9,804
Whats so disgusting about it termy? Many Heterosexual couples perform both anal and oral sex just like male and female homosexual couples do.

Let me guess termy. You’re a straight up missionary man and anything else is sick and perverted.
 

JoeD

First Grade
Messages
7,056
Why do people always bring up children? Why can't they make an argument that doesn't involve kids? If you had young kids, would you let them watch violent movies? No, that is because they are no mature enough understand what they are seeing. Does this make violent movies immoral? I don't think so, I found them quite entertaining, I assume you do to with what you call yourself.
 

Terminator

First Grade
Messages
6,303
salivor said:
Whats so disgusting about it termy? Many Heterosexual couples perform both anal and oral sex just like male and female homosexual couples do.

Let me guess termy. You’re a straight up missionary man and anything else is sick and perverted.

I think screwing a chick in the arse is disgusting too, and if one asked me too she would be out the door, no I'm not a straight up missionary man at all Salivor, I got an imagination just like most of everyone else, however if you think a sewer is fun to play in thats your problem not mine.
 

salivor

First Grade
Messages
9,804
What about oral sex? You didn't mention that in your reply, I assume if you've got nothing against oral sex then lesbians are A-OK by you.
 

millersnose

Post Whore
Messages
65,223
but termy even madonna and kylie are on record as saying they like anal sex

surely these fine women are not immoral
 

salivor

First Grade
Messages
9,804
Madonna a moral person? :lol:
You've got to love the extremes this thread has reached in all directions.
 

millersnose

Post Whore
Messages
65,223
salivor said:
Madonna a moral person? :lol:
You've got to love the extremes this thread has reached in all directions.

shes a good catholic girl

she just likes whips and things
 

The Engineers Room

First Grade
Messages
8,945
terminator007 said:
If anyone here thinks theres nothing wrong with someone sticking a corpse, because its not hurting anyone

I don't think anyone would agree to donating there body. I mean it's hard enough to get organ donors.
 

Terminator

First Grade
Messages
6,303
salivor said:
BTW, theres still a question waiting here for you termy to answer.

Im not going to get involved in a penthouse style forum chat with you Salivor, what I like is really none of your buisness, you know what I'm against, so just leave it at that, ring up a sexline if your into the heavybreathing stuff, they were made for people like you. :lol:
 

Latest posts

Top