What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

The world's gayest nation

Moffo

Referee
Messages
23,986
Never had a problem with lesbians myself :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

\\:D/ \\:D/ \\:D/ \\:D/ \\:D/ \\:D/ \\:D/ \\:D/ \\:D/ \\:D/

Cheers,
Moffo
 

salivor

First Grade
Messages
9,804
terminator007 said:
salivor said:
:lol: Your right I am a pervert termy. Do you greet most people like that on the street?

Sorry but you've made your faith an issue on this forum. You have chosen to start religious motivated threads in the past and chosen to give advice to El Duque on what he can to do rid himself of that evil pentagram. If you don't want to put your faith to the test then don't bring it up.

Don'y worry Salivor I think I passed your grubby little test on my faith quite adequetly.
You made my faith an Issue alot more than I ever did, my advice to El Dick was out of concern, which was hissed at venomously, your kind of guy.
And its sad to hear you admit to being a pervert, and I wouldnt greet one on the street Salivor unless it could'nt be helped.

You failed miserably. All you've shown is that your quite happy to impose your moral objections against homosexuality on others but its not ok to bring up that some people may be morally outraged that you have gone against your faiths teaching and had sex before marriage.
 

brook

First Grade
Messages
5,065
Moffo said:
Never had a problem with lesbians myself :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

\\:D/ \\:D/ \\:D/ \\:D/ \\:D/ \\:D/ \\:D/ \\:D/ \\:D/ \\:D/

Cheers,
Moffo

Moffo while I think thats the answer most of the guys on here would give its also remarkably hypocritical given what you've been arguing for the last 14 or so pages!!
 

Moffo

Referee
Messages
23,986
brook said:
Moffo said:
Never had a problem with lesbians myself :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

\\:D/ \\:D/ \\:D/ \\:D/ \\:D/ \\:D/ \\:D/ \\:D/ \\:D/ \\:D/

Cheers,
Moffo

Moffo while I think thats the answer most of the guys on here would give its also remarkably hypocritical given what you've been arguing for the last 14 or so pages!!

Im being sarcasticcc..im sure even salivor would note that :lol:

Although i don't think i've said anywhere that i hate gays :shock:

Cheers,
Moffo
 

Anonymous

Juniors
Messages
46
Moffo said:
salivor said:
Don't knock it until you've tried it moffo.
The future is near, there will be week long pleasure cruises with all the dead booty you can get your hands on.

Geez, im sure there are plenty of 'live' girls out there that would feel like your porking....ah don't worry, thats going to far :lol: :lol: :lol:

Cheers,
Moffo
I have to confess to enjoying a bit of shagging with the dead. But it wasnt my fault... I thought she was American.
 

salivor

First Grade
Messages
9,804
And same sex couples performing oral sex on each other is called homosexuality.

Both are an unnatural occurence! Except over thousands of years one has become more socialy acceptable than the other....

This has already been done a thousand times in this debate. Homosexuality is sex between consenting adults. Beastiality is animal abuse. Have you ever known an animal to consent to sex with a human unless your Dr Dolittle?

Correct!

But pornography isnt real ........It is staged, and it is by no means a true measure of what lesbianism is, or what it stands for...............

The bottom line for what makes lesbian pornography entertaining is this..........(excuse my perhaps offensive phrasing) - There is two pussys to perve on instead of one

Lesbian pornography isn't real? Right...thats a very logical argument.

Again ........no one is dumb enough to think that that is a true indication of lesbianism! It was nothing more than a stunt ............Two hot women kissing each other in an attempt to "sell" an awards night...

......nothing more, nothing less

oO, i see you've brung the word "twig" into the equation! ....bait perhaps?!

Im not scared of all this PC bullsh!t, so i'll bite....

In my eyes, there are 2 catergorys of gay men...

There are .....1.Gays .......2.twigs

1. Gays go about there business in a respectable fashion, and i have come to accept there place in the community..........They dont try to force there sexuality down your throat, and they behave like a normal member of the community

2. twigs walk around the streets in broad daylight in womens clothes(or in tight leather shorts), with their wrists slung limper than a piece of thin rubber, they purposely walk like they've got a carrot up their clacker, and they purposely put on a voice that makes them sound, well, gay!

IMO they are a general discrace to the community, and a total embarrassment! If you think the youth of today should be exposed to such perverts then so be it ........but quite frankly they make me nauseous!

But you'd have no problem with some of these blokey blokes going around showing of their masculinity? Get a grip on reality, homosexuals who are openly homosexual are a disgrace to society but its ok for heterosexuals to be openly heterosexual.
 

brook

First Grade
Messages
5,065
Moffo said:
brook said:
Moffo said:
Never had a problem with lesbians myself :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

\\:D/ \\:D/ \\:D/ \\:D/ \\:D/ \\:D/ \\:D/ \\:D/ \\:D/ \\:D/

Cheers,
Moffo

Moffo while I think thats the answer most of the guys on here would give its also remarkably hypocritical given what you've been arguing for the last 14 or so pages!!

Im being sarcasticcc..im sure even salivor would note that :lol:

Although i don't think i've said anywhere that i hate gays :shock:

Cheers,
Moffo

You telling me there was no truth in that answer? ;-)
 

Moffo

Referee
Messages
23,986
once again, to be consistent id view it in the same way as i would with gays. (ie: im not going to discriminate against them based on that choice but i don't necessarily agree with the choice)

But obviously, im also a guy, and for a guy to say that two girls going at it with each other doesn't at worst 'appeal'....well, i dont know what can be said for them :lol:

Cheers,
Moffo
 

eloquentEEL

First Grade
Messages
8,065
Thierry Henry said:
Whereas me, being a complete far left anti-morality lunatic, just thinks we should let anything and everything go that isn't rape.

ah... the quote of the thread. I agree that any form of sex you care to mention can be fine and dandy. The thing with incest, pedophilia and beastiality is that it is extremely difficult to police in identifying when it is rape and when it isn't. I suggest this is why society continues to reject them, while society is starting to realise that there is nothing inherently bad in homosexuality in itself and it is just as easy to police in terms of rape as is heterosexuality.
 

Terminator

First Grade
Messages
6,303
[quote="salivorYou failed miserably. All you've shown is that your quite happy to impose your moral objections against homosexuality on others but its not ok to bring up that some people may be morally outraged that you have gone against your faiths teaching and had sex before marriage.[/quote]

Yes I am happy to impose as you say my moral standard's against what I think is obscene, sorry that my mere thinking of this or typing it on to a keyboard should throw you so much, and I don't think I failed miserably as you put it , if anything I showed everyone what a complete and utter wanker you really are.
 

cheese

Bench
Messages
4,013
salivor said:
Homosexuality is sex between consenting adults. Beastiality is animal abuse.
Both an unnatural occurence....

But you'd have no problem with some of these blokey blokes going around showing of their masculinity? Get a grip on reality, homosexuals who are openly homosexual are a disgrace to society but its ok for heterosexuals to be openly heterosexual.
oO ....i see how you like to put a spin on things to suit your argument!

So in your own little political correct world, you think that if a guy walks down oxford street in the middle of the day with the ass section cut out of his pants, that this is tottally acceptable behaviour?!

If a hetereosexual male was to do this he would probably be sent to the nutter bin, and charged with indecent exposure ...........but seeming asthough they are 'gay', its ok for them to flash their arse in public, infront of school kids, infront of families??.........

.........and explain your term "open heterosexuality" .......I'd be interested in seeing what you come up with.............If you classify drinking a stubbie of VB and going to the gym as being "openly heterosexual", then you sure are struggling
 

salivor

First Grade
Messages
9,804
No termy, you showed that you are hypocritical and fail to practice what you preach. Sadly you’re caught up in your delusional thinking that you’re a better man than the rest of us because we happen to disagree with you.
 

Terminator

First Grade
Messages
6,303
salivor said:
No termy, you showed that you are hypocritical and fail to practice what you preach. Sadly you’re caught up in your delusional thinking that you’re a better man than the rest of us because we happen to disagree with you.
Oh I'm so sorry I failed your little test pervyboy, I don't think I'm a better man than most of the posters on here, you very easily.
 

eloquentEEL

First Grade
Messages
8,065
cheese said:
Goangod has proven that it isnt as healthy as heterosexuality, and if you honestly believe that it is "natural", then you've obviously smoked way too many...

an interesting argument. but here's a counter:
medical science has shown that circumcision is healthier than not being circumcised... does this mean that we should shun people that refuse to be circumcised?
people without appendixes are at less health risk than people with appendixes... does this mean that we should shun people that refuse to have their appendix removed?

all i am trying to say in this particular post is that "it's not healthy" is not a valid excuse for saying that homosexuality is wrong
 

brook

First Grade
Messages
5,065
eels2win said:
cheese said:
Goangod has proven that it isnt as healthy as heterosexuality, and if you honestly believe that it is "natural", then you've obviously smoked way too many...

an interesting argument. but here's a counter:
medical science has shown that circumcision is healthier than not being circumcised... does this mean that we should shun people that refuse to be circumcised?
people without appendixes are at less health risk than people with appendixes... does this mean that we should shun people that refuse to have their appendix removed?

all i am trying to say in this particular post is that "it's not healthy" is not a valid excuse for saying that homosexuality is wrong

heres another one

the increased risk of certain cancers that goangod attributed to lesibian woman are mostly related to the increased risk for women who remain childless - should we attempt to 're-educate' woman who choose not to have kids?

In a similar vein men who are celibate face an increased risk of prostate cancer - clearly celibacy is not a healthy option for any males (a great line to use on your next dates ;-) )
 

Anonymous

Juniors
Messages
46
I havent read every post but it does seem that no one has raised the possibility that Australia may not be the world's gayest nation but instead, just a little more accepting of Gays and therefore more Gays are coming out.

Looking at the first posts, the original subject matter from goangod was to do with a survey by a condom company which stated that Australia was the 'World's gayest nation'.

The whole notion that such a thing can be divided up into regions is absurd and the original post was nonsense... especially considering that the survey was conducted by Durex.

In any case, the initial suggestion was about abortions and declining population... a very narrow perspective and one which immediately set up a platform of morality. That is, wild generalisations held by a select few.

But for some reason, the immigration debate didnt get a look in. Instead, 'the goangod' launched into an attack on the Gay community... that is until he petered out.

Also interesting is that for an Australian survey, an awful lot of USA statistics were used to back up the homophobic argument.

But the funniest thing about this discussion is that we've seen the subjects of paedophilia, beastiality, incest, divorce, defacto relationships and even necrophilia all given a good run as if this was in some way connected to homosexuality. Its been a real hoot.
 
Messages
4,331
Dean Moriarty said:
Considering it was an online survey, and the people who would choose to respond to this type of survey are unlikely to be representative of the general population, I wouldn't pay much attention to its results.

Hate to be smug, Willow, but that was what I was trying to say in the second post of the thread. Of course, it then wandered off into all sorts of things. You're right, though, it's been entertaining. :lol:
 

eloquentEEL

First Grade
Messages
8,065
Willow said:
I havent read every post but it does seem that no one has raised the possibility that Australia may not be the world's gayest nation but instead, just a little more accepting of Gays and therefore more Gays are coming out.

well i did suggest that the title should be something along the lines of "the world's most accepting nation" but goangod's reply was just more of the same... trying to equate homosexuality with pedophilia, necrophilia, beastiality, incest, etc etc

meanwhile, i'm still waiting for a challenge to my explanation of the differences and why society is more accepting of homosexuality than the others. for reference, my latest and most succinct explanation is in the post where I have quoted Thierry (marked with a blue and gold flame near the bottom of page 14).
 

Anonymous

Juniors
Messages
46
Dean Moriarty said:
Dean Moriarty said:
Considering it was an online survey, and the people who would choose to respond to this type of survey are unlikely to be representative of the general population, I wouldn't pay much attention to its results.

Hate to be smug, Willow, but that was what I was trying to say in the second post of the thread. Of course, it then wandered off into all sorts of things. You're right, though, it's been entertaining. :lol:
LOL. I saw that Dean and should have given you credit were its due.
Perhaps I'm just cynical but Durex stand to gain well from debates like this... are condoms a sin? :lol:
 

Anonymous

Juniors
Messages
46
eels2win said:
Willow said:
I havent read every post but it does seem that no one has raised the possibility that Australia may not be the world's gayest nation but instead, just a little more accepting of Gays and therefore more Gays are coming out.

well i did suggest that the title should be something along the lines of "the world's most accepting nation" but goangod's reply was just more of the same... trying to equate homosexuality with pedophilia, necrophilia, beastiality, incest, etc etc
LOL.. well suggesting that Australia was a little more accepting of Gays wouldnt fit in with the morality of the extreme right.
I remember seeing your post as well.

IMO, we still have a long way to go and have copped a few setbacks of late... but by-and-large, I still think Australia is fairly accepting of different life styles. Its ironic that those who rely on generalisations are often in the minority.
 

Latest posts

Top