What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Thoughts on society.....

imported_Brook

Juniors
Messages
236
where the bible itself says it is complete and is not to be added to or taken away from

and yet the Catholic Bible has an extra book to the protestant versions, and both sects ommited the gnostic gospels for purely political reasons.

On the Mormons are/aren't christians debate - Moffo you would no doubt be aware that many fundamentalist Christian groups do not regard the Catholic Church as Christian but rather as a Pagan organisation. We both know that is crap but my point is that it's a bit hard to trust the view of those that have a vested interest in promoting their sect above any others.




 
Messages
4,446
Brook,

"We both know that is crap but my point is that it's a bit hard to trust the view of those that have a vested interest in promoting their sect above any others"

Yes, i take that point and agree with it totally. But its a natural phenomenon in society, 99.9% of people will always have a 'barrow to push'. The vested interest argument is totally valid, but who doesn't have vested interests? Put it in a sporting context, and for arguments sake, each NRL team was a sect (to put it in terms of how you said it). Say you were a Tigers fan, and you met a group of 500 people who were new to the game and they all wanted to follow the same team. Would you not push the case of following the Tigers? You might say they are a great team and all, but at the end of the day, you have a vested interest in promoting your club.

I know, the example is a bit off the argument, but im just illustrating my point that there are 'vested interests' in any area of society.

Bronco,

I didn't say the Vatican was the be all and end all of Christianity. But it is seen as the head ofa large'christian denomination' (ie: Catholics). And if i was going to get a sample of the 'christian stance' on Mormons, i thought the vatican would be the most logical place to look. If you can provide me with a better place to ask the 'mormon' question, well fine, let me know and id be happy to ask them. As Steve said in a later post, the vatican does acknowledge other groups such as the anglican church.

To be honest, i dont think the Vatican should be solely responsible for the administration of 'catholic groups' throughout the world. But the fact of the matter is that the tradition goes back for many a year (perhaps even before willow was born ;)), and as we all know, its pretty hard to change religious traditions.

Willow,

"Seems to me that the realisation that Catholicism is merely a branch of christianity comes as quite a shock to some people."

It ain't surprising to me mate ;)I will rephrase something i said before however, perhaps i did say it in the wrong way. Mormons see themselves as christians. That is how i should've said it. From what i have read however, and from what Steve said before, the teachings in at least some sections of the Mormoncommunity differ fundamentally from Christian beliefs. That is why i said before that they aren't Christians as such. But i agree, i should've made a note that it was only some Mormons

El Duque,

"Moffo, I believe the vatican/pope is against the use offrangers and sex before marriage too :eek:"

Frangers? lol. As for the sex before marriage thing, its a section of Catholic teachings that I don't particularly agree with! I mean, when you take your vows, it says marriage to the exclusion of all others, something i agree with. But before the knot is tied, i find the sex before marriage idea a bit antiquidated and not a core belief involved in being catholic. Thats just me, however. It used to be against the rules to eat meat on any Friday of the year. The 'interpretations' change, and hopefully the sex before marriage thing is another issue that will be addressed soon.

MM

"faith is the reason why Christians believe and Aetheists choose not to"

Yeh mate, that is pretty much the point im getting at. Although faith can exist in many ways, such as following and believing that your footy team will get home next year!

Moffo
 

Willow

Assistant Moderator
Messages
110,141
You still haven't got it Moffo.

But at least you are being less selective with which posts you read. There's hope for you yet.
 

Willow

Assistant Moderator
Messages
110,141
Moffo, I still have 4 questions but imo, the first one wasn't answered? So where do we go now?
The Bonobos apes seem like an easier topic and quite frankly, they are more important to the original theme of this thread.
They did afterall adapt to their environment and become a different species.
 

Biblical_Eye

Juniors
Messages
3
The Most Revd Rowan Williams' first Christmas Message to the Anglican Communion as Archbishop of Canterbury is now available from the Anglican Communion News Service in seven languages.THE QUEEN IS THE HEAD OF THIS CHURCH GOD SAVE THE QUEEN;)

 

Willow

Assistant Moderator
Messages
110,141
Thats an interesting thing Eye...
I'm trying to find out who dictates the edict of 'faith' and it seems that we have two candidates: The Pope and the Queen of England.
I have asked this question in post #319 and I'm still waiting for a reply... at least you had a go at answering it.
 
Messages
4,446
Didnt answer it? I think i addressed it separately and answered it mate. You mean you didn't like my answer??? Ahhhh, ok thennn....lol

"You still haven't got it Moffo."

Which bit? Can't say i get it. A specific explanation as to what bit i dont get would be nice. I do believe that the point on mormons and christians was explained in the last post, or did u miss that bit? :eek:

Selective post reading? Never! But going through 330 posts does get a bit tiresome on the eyes

And with this post, Leisotto passes the mighty Goochies score of 333

Cheers,
Moffo
 
Messages
4,446
"I have asked this question in post #319 and I'm still waiting for a reply... at least you had a go at answering it."

Ahhh, i thought you werejust thinking aloud. Sorry mate;)

Anyways, im sure the question has been answered along the line. The edict of 'faith' is dictated to by no one. Each person has 'faith' in different things. The pope doesn't tell us what to believe, nor the Queen of England. It reminds me of an activity we did at school a long time ago. It went along the lines of the pope coming out one day and saying that it was all a big lie (ie: religion). And the question was posed, what would we do? To be honest, unless solid proof was provided, it wouldn't have changed my opinion of religion at all

Faith is an individual and private thing mate. And we all have faith in different things. The pope is the head of the RC church, i dont see him as much else apart from that

Cheers,
Moffo
 

Buddist_Eye

Juniors
Messages
1
It's official. There are now more Buddhists in Australia than Baptists. The census figures show that we have not become more godless in the past five years. If anything we have become more spiritual or more confused, depending how the data is interpreted. What is both undisputed and expected is that all main Christian denominations are in continued decline, with significant desertion from Anglican and Uniting Church denominations and, to a lesser extent, Roman Catholicism. Somewhat surprisingly, however, is that fewer of us are prepared to label ourselves atheists or agnostics than we were five years ago. In 2001 just over 15 per cent of the population classified itself as having no religion, compared to 16.5 per cent in 1996. The winners in the spirituality stakes are the eastern religions, but with immigration factors accounting for much of the increase, most notably with Islam and Hinduism. There are now more Australian Hindus (.50 per cent) than Australian Jews, (.44 per cent) at least in a religious as opposed to cultural context. Not even migration patterns, however, can account for the growth in Buddhism. In 1996 just under 200,000 people identified themselves as followers of the Buddha. That number has since risen to 360,000, outnumbering Baptists by more almost 50,000. The president of the Baptist Union of Australia, the Rev Tim Costello, said yesterday that the figures were not surprising. "The Christian churches' failure to deal with sexual abuse has enormously damaged their credibility, and that's where I think Buddhism has gained the edge," he said. "Buddhism is personal, not collective, it doesn't have a heavy institutional framework - at least not in Australia - so on the surface it's probably much more appealing today. "And there has not been betrayal of trust, which has happened with the clergy." Roman Catholicism remains the largest single religion with more than one in four Australians identifying themselves as Catholic, lapsed or otherwise. And one in five cite Anglicanism as their faith of choice. Somewhat inexplicably, however, is a noticeable growth in the number lumped into the "inadequately described" category, which jumped from 54,000 in 1996 to more than 350,000 in 2001. This does not include the undisclosed number of saboteurs who chose to list Jedi Knight, despite pre-census warnings of possible prosecution. The undisclosed number of Star Wars Jedi worshippers was apparently included in the "other [non-Christian] religions" category. So have many of us just become less articulate in describing our religious status? Possibly not, says Paul Molloy, assistant director of the Bureau of Statistics' economic and population statistics unit, who admits the jump in invalid entries is more than a little perplexing. But it is likely to have more to do with the failure of the bureau's new computerised handwriting-recognition system, he said, than any inability on the part of people to adequately express their burgeoning spirituality.</BOD>
icon_print.gif
Printer friendly version
icon_email.gif
Email to a friend ;)<br clear=all>
 
C

CanadianSteve

Guest
This leads me to think that one branch of christianity is dictating 'faith' and in turn are disregarding or criticising anything which which devitates from this version, or edict of 'faith'.
Who decides these things?
Willow, you were asking for an answer to this, though I think Moffo has answered it by now. The vatican may dictate, or make statements, about their faith, but these can only apply to Catholics. And as you can tell from Moffo's replies. not every Catholic goes along with everything the vatican says. Protestant denominations do not all have such a central authority as the pope to speak for them. In my post about the Mormons, I was trying to summarize conservative Christian opinion as I understand it. The question "who decides these things" has no direct answer. By golly, it getting mighty hard to get result here folks. This question must be one hot potato. Only speaking for myself, but I can't be on here all the time to answer every question immediately, especially with 3 teenagers in my house log lots of internet time.

It seems to me that this thread is getting circular. The non-religious types are not really interested in information, just in taking potshots.

 

El Duque

Bench
Messages
3,845
Catholics can't be taken seriously. They pick which rules they like and which they don't. Depends what suits their argument.

Btw, I was christened a catholic and attended catholic schools up till yr 10. A bit of sympathy for me please...lol
 

Latest posts

Top