Yes verification that the media fabricate BS.Is that verification?
Not true. Way under what he will get next year. $1.1m There, does everyone feel better now?Brooks or Madge would have denied the $850k if it weren’t true. They havnt .. not once.
Madge dumb merkinThere is no way he is on 1.1m , this club has never spent that on a player and if they did it would be BIG news .
They denied he was leaving, the denied they have been talking with Flanno. I'm pretty sure someone would deny him being on 1.1m if it wasn't true just so that at least they didn't look like complete imbecilesThat deal could easily have slipped by the radar..If Madge thought Brooks was the next coming it’s standard for Brooks to expect a pay increase at a certain point…I think I remember there being a delay
& They would deny it if it wasn’t true!
I agree with your sentiment Stryker. I wouldn't mind if the Bulldogs took him for $600 grand. $750g would be a dream.He ain’t worth 200k so the argument is moot.
Ive been calling for his head for at least 6 years now.
He hasn’t got any worse in that time. Just stays constant mud.
There’s only 1 team glaringly dumb enough to pay massive overs for bums & unfortunately this pathetic bum is currently on our payroll.U would have to have rocks in ur head to show any interest in brooks whatsoever.Id b doing cartwheels if he were offered 500k & we took the sizeable haircut.Andrew johns deadset is off his head & must be ingesting something seriously nasty re his delusional opinion of brooks.I agree with your sentiment Stryker. I wouldn't mind if the Bulldogs took him for $600 grand. $750g would be a dream.
The grubs contract was a perfect example of how fkd this club is.We offered him 300-400k per annum more than what his beloved junior club offered him.I don't think he is on 1.1 mill but let's be honest it totally sounds like something we would do.
If you read team spends 1.1 on halfback who no one else wanted for 800, the first team that would spring to mind would be us.
Its a load of rubbish.. If that figure was true the club would of let him walk to knights as he is no where near worth 1.1mil . These are the same media that stated he was on 850k just recently and have been caught out making up stories to get clickbait.I'll bag the club as much as anyone however I call complete BS on the Brooks $1.1m contract. Its widely reported the Knights wanted him, does anyone honestly think that would be the case if that was his contract?
They would not be bonkers enough to pay 1.1m but whatever they offered we should have taken it.I'll bag the club as much as anyone however I call complete BS on the Brooks $1.1m contract. Its widely reported the Knights wanted him, does anyone honestly think that would be the case if that was his contract?
The 6 7 & 9 will do the job required.I also have high hopes for Madden.This kids trajectory is upwards.Conversely imo Peachey is a bum & we need a better option at fullback.DL isn’t close to meeting Kpi’s for the standard of fullback needed for us to reach the goals of playing finals footy.Its a load of rubbish.. If that figure was true the club would of let him walk to knights as he is no where near worth 1.1mil . These are the same media that stated he was on 850k just recently and have been caught out making up stories to get clickbait.
FFS when are these clowns going to made accountable for this shit.
For me Let Brooks go and have our spine of 1. Daine L 6. AD 7. Hastings 9. Api 13. Peachey and have Madden as 14. Brooks going would be great for all parties
I've long suspected that these journos run the complete bullshit blog article sites that just completely make things up, so that the big news programs can legitimately claim "it's been reported that xyz"
The club is not going to come out and confirm or deny a players salary. No club have, or ever will do that