- Messages
- 100,973
THEY GET HALF BACK FROM NEWS LTD!
Sue the f**kers... oh, 14 other clubs will be footing the bill.
My point exactly. This will do nothing positive for the game.
THEY GET HALF BACK FROM NEWS LTD!
Sue the f**kers... oh, 14 other clubs will be footing the bill.
THEY GET HALF BACK FROM NEWS LTD!
Sue the f**kers... oh, 14 other clubs will be footing the bill.
Its 50k for ffs.
Let me know if the grants given to the clubs are down 5k each next year, then have a whinge.
What it does is mean these judiciary members will be unable to conduct matters concerning Melbourne Storm matters due to a perception of bias. Taking legal action against a club is enough for that to be percieved as bias.
This makes sense.
If they are going to sue the Storm theses people should never be able to sit on a Storm case again.
How can any ruling they hand out look like it was all above board with such animosity between the two parties.
2. Who the f*ck knows who you are, nuffy?
But he is an ex Manly player so it begs the question did he announce that they are planning to sue the storm during Grand final week as a ploy to distract Bellamy and the club?
Oh no maybe Ill be sued for defamation of character now for stating that.
My god that is garbage. And you wonder why the Storm are being portrayed as playing the victim?
* It's not a grapple if you tackle the man by his chin
* The whistle hadn't been blown so it's perfectly justifiable to shoulder charge a player who has grounded the ball in-goal and is kneeling motionless
* It's only because he's a Storm player
* They're only threatening to sue in order to upset the Storm's preparation for the Grand Final, not because they were verbally defamed by the coach and CEO of the club at a press conference
The list just keeps growing.
Brian Waldrom, Craig Bellamy and Cameron Smith have raised some very valid points. It's the way they have gone about it that annoys me.
Good thing they won the minor premiership then, they've just about spent it all on fines already
Bigger issue is: Williams and Ayliffe has very ordinary records as players. What are they doing as judiciary members in the first place?