us? You mean AustraliaHAL said:Congrates to the melbourne storm,does anyone have tv figures for last nights match.
It's good to see the test between us and nz is on sunday night as well(hope it is live)
Weekend finals one-sided, so were ratings
October 01, 2007 11:53am
THE AFL and NRL grand finals were both one-sided affairs, but that didn't hurt ratings for either of their broadcasters this weekend.
Last night's rugby league decider which saw the Melbourne Storm comfortably account for the Manly Sea Eagles was watched by an audience average of 2.48 million across the five capital cities.
Most of those viewers came from the traditional rugby league-loving cities of Sydney and Brisbane, where Channel 9 won primetime shares of 52.2 per cent and 40.7 per cent respectively.
Nine's rivals may as well have aired the test pattern in those cities during game time, with 70.2 of Sydney viewers and 65 per cent of Brisbane viewers tuning in to watch the Storm dominate Manly on their way to a 34-8 win.
With a home team in the final, AFL-devoted Melbourne viewers also tuned in for a dose of the other oval ball code and handed Nine a primetime network win with a 36.3 per cent share.
Adelaide and Perth weren't as easily swayed, with Channel 7 winning the night despite resting Kath & Kim across the network.
In regional centres, WIN and NBN's rugby league coverage earned the stations a combined 49 per cent audience share and added an extra 1.3 million viewers to the grand final's total viewership.
Channel 10 stood by Australian Idol with 1.05 million viewers tuning in for the show's acoustic night.
Saturday was Ten day to shine with the AFL grand final coverage starting at breakfast and the post-match celebrations continuing until news time.
Although Nine won primetime, the damage was done early with the day's top three shows on Ten and all AFL related.
The match itself, a record-breaking 163-44 for Geelong over Port Adelaide, was watched by an average 2.57 million viewers from 2.30pm (AEST).
An audience of 2.38 million tuned in for the aftermath of Port Power's embarrassing defeat while 1.94 million viewers settled in early for the pre-match build-up.
Despite winning the night, Nine didn't make the top five shows with ABC's New Tricks watched by 1.36 million people and Ten's post-footy news watched by 1.33 million viewers.
ucantseeme said:That's a pretty good result, the NRL should be happy. I wonder what the number would be if they included international ratings from NZ, UK, USA etc,
Since Storm and Eagles aren't the 2 most popular teams in the NRL, I wonder which 2 teams would grab the highest ratings in a GF. The Tigers would be one then maybe the Dragons.
Cumberland Throw said:The 2007 NRL Grand Final was huge business for the Nine Network last night snaring 2.48m viewers.
The Melbourne Storm vs Manly match is currently the #3 rating show of 2007, and Nine's biggest audience all year.
It peaked at 2.86m viewers and gave Nine a whopping 40.7% share across the country.
In Sydney 935,000 viewers tuned in, Melbourne had 743,000 viewers and were rewarded with a win by their boys.
But the huge crowd couldn't top the 2007 AFL Grand Final which won 2.57m viewers out of prime time on Saturday.
But not necessarily outside Sydney which is the point Collingwood Storm made. Any combination not including the Storm not only needs to be a strong drawer in its own right but rate well enough in Sydney and/or Brisbane to cover the loss of almost half a million viewers from the nation's second biggest television market. In the present competition, I really doubt you're going to see much more ratings potential than last year's Brisbane vs Melbourne match-up. With so many teams in the Sydney market and as a traditional RL city, supporters in that area have a history of still tuning into the match even as neutrals. Having one team from each of the next two biggest television markets, especially from one that does not have a traditional RL following, maxmises the potential ratings for the match. Having two teams from the same city does not. It provides a spike in that one market while losing significant ground in other major markets.Timmah said:Parra/Dogs, Wests/Saints, Roosters/Bunnies GFs would all rate the ass off any other TV program throughout the year, and even rival SOO.
Quidgybo said:But not necessarily outside Sydney which is the point Collingwood Storm made. Any combination not including the Storm not only needs to be a strong drawer in its own right but rate well enough in Sydney and/or Brisbane to cover the loss of almost half a million viewers from the nations second biggest television market. In the present competition, I really doubt you're going to see much more ratings potential than last year's Brisbane vs Melbourne match-up. With so many teams in the Sydney market and as a traditional RL city, supporters in that area have a history of still tuning into the match even as neutrals. Having one team from each of the next two biggest television markets, especially from one that does not have a traditional RL following, maxmises the potential ratings for the match. Having two teams from the same city does not. It provides a spike in that one market while losing significant ground in other major markets.
Leigh.
Collingwood Storm said:that would get huge ratings in Sydney, probably 1.1mil - 1.4mil but would decrease quite a bit in Melb and probably stay the same in Bris
The Titans are still building a fanbase. Sydney people are fairly indifferent to them at the moment. It's good they've got a team in the comp but they aren't a big drawcard yet.Cowboys or Titans v Storm would have to be the best rating.