Das Hassler
Bench
- Messages
- 3,289
I knew what you meant. So why mention it? Oh don't bother as I could not be bothered. I see that you suffer from little man's syndrome? Hilarious.
Ok...as fair as i can be....you're a nutjob
I knew what you meant. So why mention it? Oh don't bother as I could not be bothered. I see that you suffer from little man's syndrome? Hilarious.
Ah, so this is why you’ve been defending May so much, you don’t actually think he did anything wrong. Good to know.How can you say this? The charges were dropped, ie nothing could be proven. He should have fought the one he pleaded guilty to as well, poorly advised once again.
Thank you.Ok...as fair as i can be....you're a nutjob
Do you always attempt to put words into the mouths of others?Ah, so this is why you’ve been defending May so much, you don’t actually think he did anything wrong. Good to know.
Do you always attempt to put words into the mouths of others?
Because he could have demonstrated with a skilled barrister that the victims were not perturbed in the slightest until the material became viral. The recording of it wasn't a problem but the posting online was, otherwise they'd have gone to the cops long before it appeared online.It seemed the obvious implication, am I wrong?
Why don’t you think he should’ve plead guilty then?
Really Di? Really?I can pick a few, your spelling, and grammar, errors are appalling.
Oh I can go harder. However, you are not worth it. The Dragons gave that sub-human a second chance. Not the Tigers. So that's on the Dragons.Oh I can go harder, however, you are not worth it. The dragons gave that sub human a second chance, not the Tigers. So that's on the dragons. Nice retort, try coming up with your own next time.
Do you always attempt to put words into the mouths of others?
No one who saw The Family Man embrace his son after they had won a premiership together doubts he did the right thing.N
No...not quite true unfortunately...it was Ivan's ultimatum to Isaac Moses group of four...Tedesco..Woods...Moses and Brooks stringing the club along ..that they " have to decide if they're on the bus or not" as he wanted a commitment...of course he was right in puting it to them that way, he just didn't mention he wasn't including himself.
No one who saw The Family Man embrace his son after they had won a premiership together doubts he did the right thing.
And before you say it, ‘the Tigers gave him a chance when no one did blah, blah blah’ I am sure he would be reflective and appreciative of the time he spent at the Tigers and the way it went down if Tigpies fans and even their CEO didn’t go on like entitled fools about the whole situation.
100% correct.It really doesn’t. They are bound by legal precedents.
In the first instance he was dealt with by a local court so he was sentenced by a Magistrate, not a judge. Judges preside over higher courts ie District or Supreme Courts depending in the severity of the charges.
Persons with no prior convictions don’t get sentenced to prison terms and nor should they, assuming they are being dealt with in a Local Court.
Whatever your position is on what Tyrone May did, given all the facts, his previous good character, no prior criminal convictions he was not someone who would ever be considered for a full time custodial sentence.
I am of the view the actions of Tyrone May do not constitute acts of violence towards women as some have suggested.No one is suggesting violence against women doesn’t get much worse than what Tyrone May has done, yours is a total strawman argument.
This is a forum to discuss the Penrith Panthers, that’s why the focus is on May. This isn’t hard to grasp.
No one on here as far as I can recall has ever defended or attempted to excuse what Tyrone May did. No one.Ah, so this is why you’ve been defending May so much, you don’t actually think he did anything wrong. Good to know.
Which is f**king pathetic. I really hope her family sorts the merkin at some point100% correct.
Even the DPP submitted that they did not believe that TMay deserved a custodial sentence.
I would have thought the opposite, the distribution or publishing such videos in a public domain is actually worse.Point I was making is filming a woman without consent is far worse than distributing it. The video got out because of him, even if he wasn’t convicted of distribution.
It’s the law. Legal precedents. Case Law, google it.Which is f**king pathetic. I really hope her family sorts the merkin at some point
Big if that, but excellent idea. In France best of all, media won't be an issue there if he keeps his head down.Maybe it’s time for Tyrone to think about playing overseas for a couple of years in the English Super League, competition Is weaker there, he might regain the confidence In his leg that he had before his acl operation, might let him grow up a bit to if he can get a visa
Settled for an undisclosed sum some months back. Interestingly this would have left the way open for the other woman, from the north coast, to do likewise but she hasn't bothered, nor has she talked to media.It’s the law. Legal precedents. Case Law, google it.
Are you suggesting the family of the victim should somehow seek there own retribution? Really.
As I understand she was or is pursuing damages in the civil courts. Hopefully she receives adequate compensation pursuing her case through lawful endeavours.