- Messages
- 47,627
I've heard the average in Australia is 14, so you're doing fine, Alba :lol:
arggghhh... after reading how old peeps were when they first had sex, I started feeling really shit about myself, but then.... JW came along 15 as well here. I touched my first boobs (that weren't my own) at 19, and my first kiss was when I was 12..
ummmmmmmmmmmmmm... I wanna change my last name, to my Dad's.. my maja has a serious problem with this, but I wanna be like f**k YOU, you don't get to decide. Am I wrong to think that I should have had my Dad's last name from birth? It's not like he was absent? From what I hear, she only took that away from him out of pure spite, and then when my brothers were born, she used the excuse that she didn't want us to have different last names. Anyway, it isn't really about that, I just want some serious changes in my life. I've always had in the back of my head, that I would like to have my Dad's last name. Does she have a case to be in my face with this?
Mini SMBN only got my surname after the Wife and I flipped a coin.
Should have gone rogue and given mini a completely different surname
Imagine the confused faces then :lol:
I've heard the average in Australia is 14, so you're doing fine, Alba :lol:
Yeah, I don't think so.
Various sources have it anywhere between 14, 16, and 18 depending on where you check.
Certainly it's lowering considerably with each successive generation.
Not really likely to ever get good data on it given people tend to be a bit secretive about their sex lives, and especially so if they think they've done something 'wrong'.
It's the same way "Average penis size" works - you ask the question. People are bound to lie about it. Without flashing it, they can say "Oh, I have this"
They lie to either seem cool and say they lost it at 14, or play it safe and say "Oh, 17". It's an invalid measurement of data if you ask me.
But I'd be willing to bed, it would be around 16. Given that the deviation would then swing from 14-18 in standard.
I would say 15-16 seems the right area given anecdotal evidence from people I've spoken to plus the fact it's the median between the low and high end of the scale.
I find average penis size studies to be pretty plausible given how damned low the average ends up being. If people are really exaggerating their length in these studies, I worry for the 'average' man.
The "internet" studies put it at X range. The true studied, certified by doctors (Where they examine said specimen) is significantly lower.
My lecturer sent me an article the other day, saying that several hospitals in Europe have kept track of such, and what they are noticing over many generations is shrinking across the population overall. Interesting trend.
It seems like the average has shifted considerably in the last 15-20 years alone.
I remember being proud to be 'above average' in high school when they said it was six inches, and now you find studies putting it closer to 3".
I can say now, it's not either of those going by the most recent study I read, where a decent sample size was used. Somewhere in between.
Either way, it's something, like many other variables that will never be 100% confirmed.
It's the same way "Average penis size" works - you ask the question. People are bound to lie about it. Without flashing it, they can say "Oh, I have this"
They lie to either seem cool and say they lost it at 14, or play it safe and say "Oh, 17". It's an invalid measurement of data if you ask me.
But I'd be willing to bed, it would be around 16. Given that the deviation would then swing from 14-18 in standard.
you are over 18, you can change your name to whatever you want..
forget what everyone else says or thinks.. your name is what you identify yourself by.
yours sincerely,
max power.
Why can't you just say what the study had it at?
Was the study global? Or specifically Australian?
lolz
I would worry about the average man too, if the average is 3 inches lol.. although, I'm pretty much a virgin, so 3 inches would probably get the job done haha
[YOUTUBE]CQh-fr44-Nk[/YOUTUBE]
As ultra is larger (and therefore superior) to super, I am starting this thread for those who consider themselves intellectually above the common dross and human filth that posts 90% of the junk in the so-called Superthread.
Single word posts, random images without a commentary, cricket talk, and motor 'sports' talk are not allowed. That includes guys riding bikes in France.
Where's your caption, nub?