That’s a home run bath Ruth would be proud of
Don't run away from your claims. You claimed alwaysgreen, canard and I all said the Dolphins would fail. Quote the posts.
That’s a home run bath Ruth would be proud of
Pretty funny that guys thought Bears hosting games in Sydney was a bad idea are now asking why they aren't investing more
The investors don’t.Why do the investors want them to play more games away from their newly renovated home in Perth which holds at least double the capacity of NSO?
He can't because it is not possible.Don't run away from your claims. You claimed alwaysgreen, canard and I all said the Dolphins would fail. Quote the posts.
It really is, they invest nothing, and seemingly hold all the cards.The quasi team narrative has been quashed.
They don’t hold all the cards lolIt really is, they invest nothing, and seemingly hold all the cards.
Only because PVL says it must be the Bears.
That in itself shows how flawed the whole process is.
Pretty sure their plan all along was to get one game a year, two would've been a bonus.
But you can't begin negotiating at one or you could end up with nothing, or just a trial, which means nothing anyway.
The ARLC told Perth it the Bears or nothing.They don’t hold all the cards lol
The ARLC does.
lol they respond to being called alts
That’s not what he said lolI agree with this take ..: but someone else is suggesting that potential investment in the team is being withheld because they aren’t playing more games in Sydney …
That’s not what he said lol
He said the same people asking for the bears to invest in the team will be the same ones complaining when the bears then ask for more home games
Greater bears involvement means more control and home games over the team
The previous bid team had zero interest in this
If the bears fans are so passionate they have the option of attending away games when the frankenbears travel to Sydney.
Playing at a hovel is keeping to the past - isn't that what you peanuts are against?
Why do the investors want them to play more games away from their newly renovated home in Perth which holds at least double the capacity of NSO?
Take out the a league and super rugby games and sure that might be a valid argumentso how much money do you expect them to put in for more games? $5m perhaps ?
The WA Govt is putting in $300m to redevelop their stadium … this could be subject to a minimum number of games being played there … why possibly put that at risk ?
so how much money do you expect them to put in for more games? $5m perhaps ?
The WA Govt is putting in $300m to redevelop their stadium … this could be subject to a minimum number of games being played there … why possibly put that at risk ?
Again the private investors would expanding their brand.
The Leagues Club side of it no.
They are two seperate things
The ARLC told Perth it the Bears or nothing.
That's a shit way to run a process.
It should be a total clean slate.
This arrangement will see the Bears jump ship the moment they think they see a better opportunity.