Yep, lots to like about Webby.
Been wondering recently though... what do you guys reckon is the key difference between him and Ciraldo?
Both came out of the Penrith set up, both took on struggling clubs but both obviously had very different first up seasons.
Everything written about Ciraldo’s people mgmt skills has been glowing yet there was all kinds of player unrest reported at the Dogs. Contrast that with Webby who was unspoken of before getting the gig with us but has proven himself (so far) a brilliant people person, on all fronts.
Did Webby benefit from good recruitment decisions made prior to him joining? i.e. CNK, Barnett, Niukora? If so, Cameron George and Cappy deserve massive credit.
Now, I don't rate Ciraldo as a coach at all - I think he's been overhyped, though that's not really his fault, more folks like Gould blowing smoke about him at every opportunity, which is Gould's typical MO when wanting to sign someone, player or coach.
That being said, imo Ciraldo inherited a much worse situation at the Dogs than Webby did here, both in terms of roster and culture. He may bounce back this season, now that most of the players who had issues with his methods are gone, though I don't really think Gould has done a great job of recruiting to fill the gaps. Feels to me like they'll be running out a team with 10+ players who can play lots of different positions but none of them at an elite level. Add to that, (imo) Burton is a centre, not a five-eighth, and Kikau is pretty useless unless he's in a dominating pack, and I reckon they'll struggle. Maybe 2025 might be when we really see what Ciraldo is like as a coach.
I've heard a lot about Ciraldo's man management skills, too, but I haven't really seen any evidence of that yet.
Webby definitely benefited from some of the recruitment that happened before he arrived, but the fact he managed to unlock basically every player in the squad (apart from Vailea, and maybe Bunty, though he might already be at his ceiling) is pretty huge. And apart from Vailea, and AFB now, nobody jumped ship. I've been seriously expecting Volkman to move on, but he hasn't yet, which I'm pretty happy about.
But maybe Webby will have a poor second year, ala Todd Payten. That's definitely a big possibility.
But anyway, what do I think is the key difference between Webby and Ciraldo? Both appear to set high standards in terms of fitness, etc, but I think it's Webby's overall focus. He seems intent on instilling confidence in his players, and wants them to enjoy their footy and each other. To me, it feels like Ciraldo is very military in his approach, and is more about the stick than the carrot, and especially how hard to hit with the stick. Of course, I'm just a fan with absolutely no inside knowledge and maybe the reality is very different.
What I find really interesting is that it seems like Webby's core values around culture, etc, are very similar to what Kearney's were. Yet, while Kearney never appeared to lose the dressing room (just Johnson), his results were just poor.