This is good work and I also believe it resonates with the work of Crichton.I doubt he'd be turning in his grave, it's great so far and although they've expanded it, it lines up with the themes which Crichton is known for. If it delivers on the promise of the first episode it will exceed the 1973 film.
His work has been bastardized in the past, this isn't like that.
Edit: oh, you said 'If not', misread your post
I'm actually very surprised to read a few comments in here about the profanity in Deadwood and how it is "lazy screenwriting".
How anyone can even contemplate callling any of the teleplays of any episodes of those 3 seasons as "lazy" is beyond me! That show is like Shakespeare in the Wild West.
I get none of that in Deadwood or that first episode of Westworld. I found the writing gratuitous and the wooden delivery of the lines seemed like it is all 'just get it done in one take'. Compare this with the Sopranos or with movies like Snatch or Lock Stock or Trainspotting.
The first episode was great. I hope it doesn't fall away like the last HBO production - 'the night of'. That and season 2 of True Detective were the only HBO I haven't liked.
Question; is viewing of the film mandatory before watching the series?
I have been jonesing for a western show since Deadwood finished. I tried Hell On Wheels, I really did, but just couldn't get in to it. A former colleague suggested I get on this and after watching that trailer I am on board!
Ed f**king Harris! Baddest motherf**ker alive! From that trailer I'm going to go out on a limb and wager The Man In Black to be a cross between Virgil Cole (his Apaloosa character) and Carl Fogarty (A History of Violence) with elements of The Terminator.
I'm actually very surprised to read a few comments in here about the profanity in Deadwood and how it is "lazy screenwriting".
How anyone can even contemplate callling any of the teleplays of any episodes of those 3 seasons as "lazy" is beyond me! That show is like Shakespeare in the Wild West.
I mightn't have given it a fair go. To put it in context - I rated what I saw of Deadwood on a par with Sons of Anarchy.
Deadwood is far, far superior. There are some compelling characters. Al Swearengen (or whatever) is complex and enduring.I mightn't have given it a fair go. To put it in context - I rated what I saw of Deadwood on a par with Sons of Anarchy.
I suggest giving Deadwood a proper go, the characters are nuanced and complex. Sons of Anarchy shouldn't even be mentioned in the same breath.See I'm not a SOA fan either. Just personal preferences I guess - might explain why I was 'meh' about Deadwood as well
My expectations of The Night Of are somewhere around The Wire. Which is a very high standard to hit.
See I'm not a SOA fan either. Just personal preferences I guess - might explain why I was 'meh' about Deadwood as well