I would like to revisit an idea that I know has been discussed before and that is that articles in big games be marked by 2 refs at least, rather than just the one. Let me just say that this is in no way meant to be a go at the refs, because I truly think they do a great job and mark articles with fairness, integrity and the best intentions towards the F7s. However, there is no doubt that there are certain refs that 'get' an article, or indeed a writer's particular style, while others seem to not so much and the marks from these respective refs reflect that. I just think that in big games it can be frustrating when you know you've got the ref, or one of the refs, who fall into the latter category and it would create a fairer system in these crunch games if we got at least one other ref involved.
I cannot recall in the previous discussion in relation to this topic what objections, or issues there were, however I just wondered what others' thoughts are on this. Once again, this is in no way meant to have a go at any ref - I think you're all legends for putting in your time and effort the way you guys do.