No, you are trying to move the posts to protect your ludicrous statement which I very quickly and easily proved to be wrong.Brett Stewart has made the fullback position his own and has nothing to prove as a footballer. The analogy is poor. Try again
It would be if Tedesco was as good as Hayne and Slater.Very good point.
It would be if Tedesco was as good as Hayne and Slater.
Therefore, as this isn't the case, it's another poor point.
Hayne has played quite a bit of winger hasn't he (even started his NRL career there)? Slater is the best fullback of this generation and even then he's a pretty damn average winger.
And the point about it being Origin and not an NRL game is lost on you no doubt....
Here are some others off the top of my head who dont have much trouble playing wing or fullback:
Nightingale
Boyd
Minichello
Anyway, will be interesting to see how he goes this week as he has been picked again on the wing...
You continue to make a compelling case. Well done.
Is the case really that compelling when the players being used as examples have YEARS more experience that Tedesco ?
And the point about it being Origin and not an NRL game is lost on you no doubt....
Here are some others off the top of my head who dont have much trouble playing wing or fullback:
Nightingale
Boyd
Minichello
Anyway, will be interesting to see how he goes this week as he has been picked again on the wing...
I said nothing about Origin. If you are good enough to play origin then you would be capable of playing out of position. Where did i say that Tedesco was good enough to play origin.
Again, another stupid statement moving the posts to suit your own argument.
What tangent will you & coupe use next? Rugby union test match performances by Argentinian players?
Funny that such a glaringly obvious statement needed to be made.
Beyond me how you can compare Mini's and nightingale's ability to play in more than one position to Tedesco's ability to do the same thing.
If it has to be explained to you . . . well, I don't know what to say in your defence.
R2 coupe . . . you really are tim sheens, aren't you ?
No anger. my week is fine, thanks for feigning an interest in my welfare.Why the anger? Having a bad week?
Yet I gave one example proving otherwise and I am to be criticised?No tangent at all is required...
In my opinion if you are good enough to play fullback in the NRL you can play winger and have provided several examples ... its like your opinion that if you are good enough to play Origin, you can play out of position...
I wasn't offering a viewpoint on whether it hard for a fullback to play out of position.People are saying that its difficult for a fullback to play on the wing...
If you dont agree with that line of thinking, how else can you argue the point without providing examples of players that seem to do it without too many difficulties?
I wasn't offering a viewpoint on whether it hard for a fullback to play out of position.
I remarked on the absurdity of the comment that an "NRL player should be able to play more than one position" and gave a very good example why that statement was wrong.
All other arguments stemmed from people trying to alter their arguments to protect their invalidated view, moving goalposts and disregarding the simple fact I provided.