Tonearm Terrorwrist
Immortal
- Messages
- 33,280
WOW a moron with a job .
1) you cannot spell (Souths,stupid !!).
2) you use cheap comparison logic(highlighted) to be negative.
a) you then provide example of Bayern, who also have less crowds than members,so are you saying Bayern also compare poorly with Roosters ,who have a greater average crowd than members ? twit !!
b) Do Roosters attract higher average home crowd than Souths in 2010? Answer is NOT ,twit.
So Souths had more members,willing to PAY membership fee , and a greater average HOME crowd in 2010 versus Roosters and even Melbourne and you are knocking Souths ? more twit
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Australian_football_code_crowds#Attendances_by_Team
Congratulations, where do you work?
I spelled Souffs correctly
Where is the comparison?
They average 69,000 in a 69,000 capacity stadium, the highlight there is that they would probably get close to 100,000 a game if they had the stadium unlike Souffs but they're irrelevant aswell.
That has nothing to do with it so stop being like Ziggy and deflecting and dodging and give me some reasons as to why Souffs are the only team in the NRL to average less than their total membership base when they play in an 80,000 seater stadium, With 17,000 members Souffs should be averaging 22,000+
Again, irrelevant but I also cast doubt on how many members actually paid for their membership with all of the free membership given out to kids and probably celebrities.
Cool link, nothing explains why Souffs average less than their membershop base though.
Oh, I forgot. Eff Off Troll
