Yes, this is what I`m driving at.
Thirty years ago you would not have expected AFL to be the main beneficiary of a sharp decline in Australian RU. The cashed-up event-goers who typically attend Wallabies games in Sydney seem to have transferred their weekly allegiance from the Waratahs to the Swans. The two games are so different on the field that there has to be some cultural rationale behind the shift.
If the private schools who embraced Aussie Rules, apparently to the detriment of RU, had instead successfully added RL to their sports programmes maybe the Roosters would be pulling 25-30k average crowds rather than the Swans.
During the lean period for English Soccer people were still "exposed to" Soccer but they didn`t go to matches or follow a team. Playing a sport at school or having family members and friends who play a sport at school is far more likely to generate an active supporter base for that sport than simply existing in a city where it`s colloquially top dog.
Soccer used to be déclassé in England. You should be familiar with the hoary old chestnut, "Football is a game for gentlemen played by thugs; Rugby is a game for thugs played by gentlemen". In private schools and State grammars the first XV was traditionally the flagship.
The NRL should study how English Soccer transformed their image and revived their fortunes. Deep down, it`s all about social class.
They were already attending Swans games whilst union was going well
Peter FitzSimons often talks well of the afl and I’m sure you know what he says about our game
the roosters don’t need to push their crowds because they don’t need the money it’s a sad fact but it’s true
even with their massive crowds and memberships the swans make small profits most years and during covid they lost 6 million in one year